https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna11 ... qidKPDTG-Q
House in new bipartisan budget, allots millions for gun safety research, which will be used to create new restrictions on gun ownership.
Millions for gun safety research
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Millions for gun safety research
Half of that goes to support NRA's Eddie Eagle Gun Safety education program right?
(I know it won't, I'm just pointing out that it should)
(I know it won't, I'm just pointing out that it should)
-
longtooth
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 12329
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Angelina County
Re: Millions for gun safety research
1. Treat every gun like it is loaded.
2. Keep it pointed in a safe direction all the time. Never cover or sweep anything or anyone you don't intend to destroy.
3. Keep your bugger hook off the bang switch til you are ready to shoot.
4. Know your target and what is beyond.
Now how much did that cost.
I know, liberal backward progressive socialist don't want to hear it. Just spend $$s and pass new laws.
PUKE.
2. Keep it pointed in a safe direction all the time. Never cover or sweep anything or anyone you don't intend to destroy.
3. Keep your bugger hook off the bang switch til you are ready to shoot.
4. Know your target and what is beyond.
Now how much did that cost.
I know, liberal backward progressive socialist don't want to hear it. Just spend $$s and pass new laws.
PUKE.
Carry 24-7 or guess right.
CHL Instructor. http://www.pdtraining.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA/TSRA Life Member - TFC Member #11
-
The Annoyed Man
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 26866
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Millions for gun safety research
I note that the article gave the NRA the last word.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
Re: Millions for gun safety research
The sad part is that there is a lot of good research that this money could fund. The issue is that in the early 1990s, a large part of academic clinicians publicly stated that they would use the public trust placed in them and in their research to produce propaganda supporting gun control legislation no matter what the data showed. Doctors For Responsible Gun Ownership pointed that fact out in Congress and got funding banned since 1994, IIRC. The issue was the public refusal of the medical establishment to produce research that was unbiased, fair, or..well...scientific.
The cardinal sin in research is to begin with a conclusion and then seek to prove it by producing data. That mindset taints even good work, and is toxic to science. Killing oneself or another human being are grossly pathological behaviors, whether they're committed using a bathtub or an M2HB. The extremely focal nature of violence involving firearms, even WITHIN at risk communities (i.e the inner cities), is striking. People are trying to do research on how those interpersonal webs operate with the goal of breaking the cycle of violence, and funding that research would save lives. Instead, we get tripe like this article that made it into JAMA (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamane ... le/2688536), wherein the authors speak at great length on projectile lethality while completely ignoring the process by which they came to rest inside human bodies.
The goal of reducing the number of people who are killed with guns (or by any sort of violence) remains a sideshow to the goal of disarming Americans.
The cardinal sin in research is to begin with a conclusion and then seek to prove it by producing data. That mindset taints even good work, and is toxic to science. Killing oneself or another human being are grossly pathological behaviors, whether they're committed using a bathtub or an M2HB. The extremely focal nature of violence involving firearms, even WITHIN at risk communities (i.e the inner cities), is striking. People are trying to do research on how those interpersonal webs operate with the goal of breaking the cycle of violence, and funding that research would save lives. Instead, we get tripe like this article that made it into JAMA (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamane ... le/2688536), wherein the authors speak at great length on projectile lethality while completely ignoring the process by which they came to rest inside human bodies.
The goal of reducing the number of people who are killed with guns (or by any sort of violence) remains a sideshow to the goal of disarming Americans.