Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Nope“Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons,” Swalwell wrote.
Yep. Make criminals out of law abiding citizens while failing to enforce existing laws that would keep law abiding citizens safe. Makes perfect sense.kayt00 wrote:Here we go again...Nope“Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons,” Swalwell wrote.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/05/0 ... to-defy-it
Say no more, he's a Nancy wantabe.Swalwell is a representative from the San Francisco area.
I'm in line...right behind ya'll. You know because someones gotta have your back.Allons wrote:RoyGBiv wrote:Ok... I'll go last.
ninjabread wrote:It looks like the main difference between this and current California law is this offers compensation if you turn it in.
close to it. I think right now they are in the registration phase...
KC5AV wrote:I might consider selling my AR15, but I seriously doubt they could afford it.
That's the starting price for some standard capacity mags.Syntyr wrote:KC5AV wrote:I might consider selling my AR15, but I seriously doubt they could afford it.
