Fascinating election logic
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1335
- Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:17 pm
Fascinating election logic
This election gets more interesting every day.
Trump’s alleged debate jaw-dropper is just plain fascinatin', as Ross Perot would have said.
It’s right out of the pages of Atlas Shrugged. Trump is expected to endorse the conduct of the election in advance, without prior knowledge of wrongdoing in the process. His permission to be a victim is expected.
Meanwhile, Hillary is thumping her unwholesome chest about how the Russians are attempting to influence the election in Trump’s favor through hacking and social engineering to foment doubt.
Trump is unAmerican because he won’t grant the election process a blank check, which makes me wonder. If Hillary felt the election had been stolen from her, would she willfully fail to do her patriotic duty to stand in defense of election integrity?
Trump and Clinton are the two most interested parties that have standing in court to do anything. By law, mere voters who wish to challenge an election have no voice in court. You or I can’t sue to enforce election law. We don’t have what the courts call “standing.” Candidates and election officials can seek fair elections through courts, the rest of the world can’t.
Trump is an egotistic braggart who lacks the spine to stand behind his own bluster.
But at least he’s not a lying, traitorous globalist who seeks to profit by the destruction of America, effecting her deleterious policies with the ultimately violent force of government while denying citizens access to self-defense.
At least he’s not that, and that’s enough to gain my vote.
Put up with Trump’s hot air, make America great again, look for better choices next go-round.
Trump’s alleged debate jaw-dropper is just plain fascinatin', as Ross Perot would have said.
It’s right out of the pages of Atlas Shrugged. Trump is expected to endorse the conduct of the election in advance, without prior knowledge of wrongdoing in the process. His permission to be a victim is expected.
Meanwhile, Hillary is thumping her unwholesome chest about how the Russians are attempting to influence the election in Trump’s favor through hacking and social engineering to foment doubt.
Trump is unAmerican because he won’t grant the election process a blank check, which makes me wonder. If Hillary felt the election had been stolen from her, would she willfully fail to do her patriotic duty to stand in defense of election integrity?
Trump and Clinton are the two most interested parties that have standing in court to do anything. By law, mere voters who wish to challenge an election have no voice in court. You or I can’t sue to enforce election law. We don’t have what the courts call “standing.” Candidates and election officials can seek fair elections through courts, the rest of the world can’t.
Trump is an egotistic braggart who lacks the spine to stand behind his own bluster.
But at least he’s not a lying, traitorous globalist who seeks to profit by the destruction of America, effecting her deleterious policies with the ultimately violent force of government while denying citizens access to self-defense.
At least he’s not that, and that’s enough to gain my vote.
Put up with Trump’s hot air, make America great again, look for better choices next go-round.
Re: Fascinating election logic
Yes, of course, just like Al Gore did... oh wait.treadlightly wrote: Trump is expected to endorse the conduct of the election in advance, without prior knowledge of wrongdoing in the process. His permission to be a victim is expected.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/639f0/639f0ab8dd62fe717e4f6a6491809a5a78e7b53c" alt="headscratch :headscratch"
Re: Fascinating election logic
Al who...?
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
- Location: North Dallas
Re: Fascinating election logic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2292f/2292fe8b941a60587d911b15379aeb878ef29f54" alt="Image"
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
-
- Moderator
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
- Location: Outskirts of Houston
Re: Fascinating election logic
Oh, You know. The inventor of the Internet and the discoverer of global warming.Abraham wrote:Al who...?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13913/139134f014f8b46cc76f734cff5e4ce3e91d06ab" alt="Wink ;-)"
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Re: Fascinating election logic
Oh yeah, I'll never forget old what's his name...nuttier than a Christmas fruitcake.
Re: Fascinating election logic
I'm surprised no one says anything about how HIllary whines about how the Russians are "putting America at risk" while she is the one leaving backdoors open for Russia....
-
- Moderator
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
- Location: Outskirts of Houston
Re: Fascinating election logic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2f5c/d2f5c869b5c5936ceab3ae14e23c827bec189063" alt="Image"
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:27 am
- Location: Katy, TX
Re: Fascinating election logic
When Hillary turned the question into Russia rigging the election and siding with Trump, Trump should have turned the conversation to Hillary wrote the emails and put them on her private server for the Russians to get them. Hillary was more outraged that the Russians got them than the content of the emails. She got me so mad I had to turn off the debate and take a relax pill.
Re: Fascinating election logic
Pravda means truth.