Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 9044
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#1

Post by mojo84 »

Have any of these recent shootings been with guns purchased at gun shows without background checks?
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

DevilDawg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:53 pm

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#2

Post by DevilDawg »

I have to wonder if they remember.....
Attachments
image.jpeg
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 9044
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#3

Post by mojo84 »

I blame much this on the spineless impotent congress. They've let the president and his administration run all over them.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

jed
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2015 7:43 am

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#4

Post by jed »

mojo84 wrote:I blame much this on the spineless impotent congress. They've let the president and his administration run all over them.
I wonder why this is? It makes no sense that they will not stand up to him.
User avatar

Middle Age Russ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1402
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:44 am
Location: Spring-Woodlands

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#5

Post by Middle Age Russ »

I wonder why this is? It makes no sense that they will not stand up to him.
On the contrary, it makes perfect sense that they aren't standing up to the Administration. The majority of the so-called representatives from both parties are simply political elites, who really only work for their own enrichment and consolidation of power. They have little interest in America, American citizens or the principles upon which this nation was founded -- except where they can be used to provide money and/or power.
Russ
Stay aware and engaged. Awareness buys time; time buys options. Survival may require moving quickly past the Observe, Orient and Decide steps to ACT.
NRA Life Member, CRSO, Basic Pistol, PPITH & PPOTH Instructor, Texas 4-H Certified Pistol & Rifle Coach, Texas LTC Instructor
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#6

Post by JALLEN »

Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#7

Post by K.Mooneyham »

Middle Age Russ wrote:
I wonder why this is? It makes no sense that they will not stand up to him.
On the contrary, it makes perfect sense that they aren't standing up to the Administration. The majority of the so-called representatives from both parties are simply political elites, who really only work for their own enrichment and consolidation of power. They have little interest in America, American citizens or the principles upon which this nation was founded -- except where they can be used to provide money and/or power.
I'm certain that the reason they don't "stand up to him" is that they don't want the mass media to brand them as "racist", and say that the only reason they did something to him was because of race. That will make him a martyr of sorts to the political left, and might be used in the upcoming election year to sway "independent" voters to vote Democrat.
User avatar

rbwhatever1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1434
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: Paradise Texas

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#8

Post by rbwhatever1 »

JALLEN wrote:One scenario might be:
http://bearingarms.com/obama-bans-guns- ... pens-next/

:shock:
I'd like to see him yanked out of a spider hole...
III
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#9

Post by The Annoyed Man »

JALLEN wrote:One scenario might be:
http://bearingarms.com/obama-bans-guns- ... pens-next/

:shock:
The incorrect assumption and the end of that scenario is that the newly ascended President Biden would announce a return to Constitutional government. He'd be still trying to figure out what was going on.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#10

Post by VMI77 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
JALLEN wrote:One scenario might be:
http://bearingarms.com/obama-bans-guns- ... pens-next/

:shock:
The incorrect assumption and the end of that scenario is that the newly ascended President Biden would announce a return to Constitutional government. He'd be still trying to figure out what was going on.
Would "president" Biden make the SS turn in their "assault" weapons of war and arm themselves instead with double barrel shotguns?
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#11

Post by VMI77 »

So then, if this kind of thing is so important, how come the confessed felon straw purchaser who armed the San Berdoo terrorists hasn't been arrested and charged with numerous crimes by this administration?
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#12

Post by anygunanywhere »

VMI77 wrote:So then, if this kind of thing is so important, how come the confessed felon straw purchaser who armed the San Berdoo terrorists hasn't been arrested and charged with numerous crimes by this administration?
He was a terrorist compadre.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#13

Post by MeMelYup »

How do we get White House adviser Valerie Jarrett on the no fly list?

striker55
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 979
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:27 am
Location: Katy, TX

Re: Whitehouse eyes restrictions without Congress..

#14

Post by striker55 »

Obama does whatever he wants, Congress won't stop him no matter what he does. In my 60+ years I've never seen a President get away with the **** he does.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”