Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

Relevant bills filed and their status

Moderator: Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#31

Post by WildBill »

ac-mech wrote:what about if the parking lot is posted 30.06? :headscratch
I think that's the point of the bill. It won't let employers post a parking lot.
NRA Endowment Member

gmckinl
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: DFW-Area

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#32

Post by gmckinl »

WildBill wrote:
ac-mech wrote:what about if the parking lot is posted 30.06? :headscratch
I think that's the point of the bill. It won't let employers post a parking lot.
We'll see, time will tell. Chas can chime in w/ the real answer; it would be interesting to hear.

I support the idea of this bill but... I suspect I will see no benefit from it at all given reports of my employers outspoken opposition to the 2007 version. Sorry, I'm just pessimistic about it. Just call me broken and bitter. :patriot:
NRA Life Member

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -- Thomas Jefferson

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5298
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#33

Post by srothstein »

ac-mech wrote:what about if the parking lot is posted 30.06? :headscratch
It would not matter. 30.06 only applies when you are carrying under the authority of your CHL and you are not using that authority if you are in your car or one you control. And, since this law applies to "otherwise lawfully possessing" the weapon, it applies then.
Steve Rothstein

israel67
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:43 am
Location: Paris, France

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#34

Post by israel67 »

dawgfishboy wrote:Would my vehicle be excluded? :headscratch

Image
Oh, lovely bike! I've the same: a burgundy red LHT. Delicious. :)
שמע, ישראל: יהוה אלהינו, יהוה אחד

Piney
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2005 8:42 am

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#35

Post by Piney »

Would this mean that my employer, who owns the gated parking garage which is on property nice and close to the building I work in, can bar me from lawfully carrying in their garage ? All they have to do is offer (provide) me with alternative parking on their lot 15 minutes by city bus ride away ?!

Upon passage, would this bill provide for lawfully carrying (parking) on parking property of an educational entity (that is or isn't one's employer) ?

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5298
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#36

Post by srothstein »

Piney, the law would require that the alternative parking lot to be "reasonably close". I doubt any court would find the 15 minute bus ride to meet those terms.

As for parking on the educational entity lot, that is legal now. Well, under state law it is legal since anyone can have the gun in their car and premises was defined as the buildings, specifically excluding parking lots. For elementary and secondary schools, you would be in violation of federal law (a very questionable law) but there is nothing the state legislature can do about that.
Steve Rothstein

KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#37

Post by KD5NRH »

srothstein wrote:As for parking on the educational entity lot, that is legal now. Well, under state law it is legal since anyone can have the gun in their car and premises was defined as the buildings, specifically excluding parking lots. For elementary and secondary schools, you would be in violation of federal law (a very questionable law) but there is nothing the state legislature can do about that.
Only if you don't have a CHL:
(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to the possession of a firearm—
(ii) if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a political subdivision of the State, and the law of the State or political subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified under law to receive the license;
Of course, (A) also requires that the firearm or its components have previously moved in interstate commerce, so if you smelted the iron and filed out the gun (legally) in your garage, you've got nothing to worry about there anyway.

mr.72
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1619
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:14 am

Re: Employer parking lot bill has been filed by Sen. Hegar

#38

Post by mr.72 »

This is a good bill that will get us an inch closer to workplace carry. Since I ride my bicycle to work nearly every day, it doesn't help me much. I think a bill that looks just like this but doesn't say anything about parking lots but simply says "premises" or "property" instead would be ideal. That's what we need eventually (gets us the rest of the way). Either the employer must allow us to carry on our persons while on their property, or they must provide a weapons locker.

There are a lot of days when I am on my bicycle and wouldn't mind having a gun with me. It's a 40-minute trip each way and you are a whole lot more vulnerable on a bicycle than you are in a car, especially when it comes to street-corner thugs.

Kudos for this bill. Its passage is a first down in this fight. The goal line is workplace carry. Let's keep moving the ball.
non-conformist CHL holder
Locked

Return to “2009 Texas Legislative Session”