No, this session, both bills cover any lawful possession of firearms.Purplehood wrote:I thought that the bill was geared towards CHL carriers only and NOT Motorist Protection Act carriers. R I kunfuzed?TrueFlog wrote:sbb's wife would be covered because she has a CHL. However, I believe federal law prohibits firearms anywhere in a school zone unless the individual has a CHL. This means that the bill would not help those teachers who don't have a CHL as they would still be bound by the feds. Is this correct?Charles L. Cotton wrote:If passed in its current forum, your wife would be protected, as it applies to both public and private employers.sbb wrote:I would hope that this proposed legislation would also apply to educators. Currently my spouse is prohibited from daily carry due to her employment contract with a large Houston area ISD. Even though she has a CHL the employment contract supersedes her rights. I know that I do not want her working in her High School's location without the ability to have access to her handgun on the way to and from campus.
Chas.
Chas.
