This is about long guns, so if in the wrong forum location or otherwise not allowed, my apologies.
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mil ... a6ef4634f8
The source is not the best, so I don't doubt the article is slanted.. Though if even partly accurate, this is an issue.
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
-
E.Marquez
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2781
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
- Location: Kempner
- Contact:
‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Re: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
So they want to base this on how a rifle looks. This means the only rifles that you can have unless you're in the military are muskets. And maybe not even them since they were used by the military at one time. So the second amendment doesn't cover any rifles. I didn't think the second amendment specify which firearms were covered.
Re: ‘Military-Style’ Firearms Aren’t Protected By Second Amendment, Court Rules
Discussion already going on in this post viewtopic.php?f=94&t=88034
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager