In January of this year Firearms Owners Against Crime (FOAC), a division of Prince Law Offices, and three individuals filed suit in county court against the city of Harrisburg, PA, because of the city's anti-gun ordinances. The suit argues (as near as I can tell) that the ordinances are illegal under Pennsylvania law, violate the 2A, and constitute deprivation of civil liberties under color of law ( a Section 1983 violation). The city's mayor has been rather defiant about this. They have lost some previous rounds already. The mayor is even trying to crowd-source funding for the city's defense, since apparently he is taking some heat for burning the taxpayers' dollars trying to ignore state preemption. He's collected $2K so far.
The city "removed" (transferred) FOAC and two of the three individuals and their suit to federal court. For some reason the city left the third individual's suit in the county court and failed to respond to the plaintiff's claims.
Now cometh the Schadenfreude:
Since the city did not respond to the third plaintiff's claims still pending in the county court, even after a required 10-day notice, the judge (formally called the Prothonotary (new one on me!)) issued a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the city to the tune of $21,000 plus other fees as determined later.
NOW the city is responding.
![Smile5 :smilelol5:](./images/smilies/smilielol5.gif)
They are trying to get both the county judge and the federal judge to nix the $21K judgment, claiming it was a "typo" that the third plaintiff was left pending in the county court. Oopsie!
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index. ... _harr.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://blog.princelaw.com/2015/01/16/pr ... rdinances/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://blog.princelaw.com/2015/03/03/de ... itigation/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;