TexasCHLforum.com

Baton Rouge Code of Ordinances § 13:95.3 provides,

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to have in his possession a firearm, or other instrumentality customarily used or intended for probable use as a dangerous weapon, in any premises where alcoholic beverages are sold and/or consumed on the premises except the owner or lessee of the premises, or their employees [or law enforcement officials]….

(b) … Any person who enters a place where alcoholic beverages are sold and/or consumed on the premises does, by the mere fact of entering, consent to a search of his person for any firearm or other instrumentality customarily used or intended for probable use as a dangerous weapon while on said premises, by any [law enforcement official], without a warrant.

(c) The phrase, “… premises where alcoholic beverages are sold and/or consumed on the premises” shall include all of the licensed premises, including the parking lot.

In sum, the Court finds that Taylor’s allegations, which the Court accepts as true based on Defendants’ default, are sufficient to establish a viable claim for relief under the Second Amendment. Consequently, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has established a sufficient basis for judgment in his favor.

GlockDude26 wrote:i am wondering if it would possible to amend the 51% rule for people who can't or do not drink. and by this I mean 0 alcohol. Take me for example, medically I can't drink anymore not, one sip for the duration of the ride. It peeves me off to no end when people I know want to go listen to live music and stuff at bars with this and I can't carry there even though the only thing i'm drinking is coke zero....to me it's one of the main times i feel people need that protection from others who get intoxicated or criminals that target these parking lots b/c they know everyone will be disarmed.....you know murder is illegal too but people still do it....