Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

"A pistol is what you use to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have left behind!" Clint Smith, Thunder Ranch

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Post Reply

Topic author
dude
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: McKinney

Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#1

Post by dude »

I bought my first rifle a few weeks ago, a Remington 597. After disassembling it for the first time, it occurred to me that after removing the stock I still had a fully functional, if not ergonomic, firearm.

In that state, it no longer meets the federal definition of a rifle since it can't be fired from the shoulder. And it's only 25.5" long without the stock, so would be illegal if it did fall into the rifle category.

Is it a now handgun? Would it have to be concealed if I had it disassembled in my car? Or would it fit better in the "AOW" category?

Silly question, but I can't help wondering.
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#2

Post by joe817 »

Hey dude, not a silly question at all. This is a place we come to to learn. Gosh I know I've learned a lot since I've been here.

It seems to me that it would be classified as a "Short-barrel firearm", as per PC 46.01(10):

"(10) "Short-barrel firearm" means a rifle with a barrel length of less than 16 inches or a shotgun with a barrel length of less than 18 inches, or any weapon made from a shotgun or rifle if, as altered, it has an overall length of less than 26 inches."

That's the definition. It's illegal to possess under PC 46.05(3):

"Sec. 46.05. PROHIBITED WEAPONS. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly possesses, manufactures, transports, repairs, or sells:
(1) an explosive weapon;
(2) a machine gun;
(3) a short-barrel firearm;
.
.
.
.
e) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree unless it is committed under Subsection (a)(5) or (a)(6), in which event, it is a Class A misdemeanor."
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380

Topic author
dude
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:27 pm
Location: McKinney

Re: Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#3

Post by dude »

I think that nails it. I only looked at the federal laws when I was reading. I guess Texas has it explicitly covered, but the Feds don't.

Those to-the-inch laws are crazy to begin with, but the unintended consequences are laughable. To think that I commit a felony in the process of cleaning a rifle....

HankB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Central TX, just west of Austin

Re: Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#4

Post by HankB »

dude wrote: To think that I commit a felony in the process of cleaning a rifle....
And not only that, you admitted to it in an open forum . . . :nono:

Guess who's going to be knocking (if you're lucky) on your door at o'dark thirty . . . :shock:
Original CHL: 2000: 56 day turnaround
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
User avatar

boomerang
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2629
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#5

Post by boomerang »

dude wrote:I think that nails it. I only looked at the federal laws when I was reading. I guess Texas has it explicitly covered, but the Feds don't.
Sure they do. USC TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 44, § 921. Definitions
(8) The term “short-barreled rifle” means a rifle having one or more barrels less than sixteen inches in length and any weapon made from a rifle (whether by alteration, modification, or otherwise) if such weapon, as modified, has an overall length of less than twenty-six inches.
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"

Mike1951
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3532
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:06 am
Location: SE Texas

Re: Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#6

Post by Mike1951 »

My SU-16C Keltec, with the stock folded, measures 25.5"

It is designed to also be fired in the folded position.

I queried Keltec and was told that ATF had approved it as designed. I never heard any justification for the exception.

I added a Yankee Hills flash hider just to be on the safe side.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member

Aggie_engr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#7

Post by Aggie_engr »

Now that you mention it mike, I wonder what the overall length of my brothers Sig 556 is when it's folded up? It came from Sig with the folding stock and can be shot with it folded in. I'll have to ask him to measure it... :confused5
User avatar

G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2984
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Re: Legal classification of stock-less rifle?

#8

Post by G.A. Heath »

Rifles with folding, and collapsible stocks are measured with the stock in the position that gives the rifle its greatest overall length. Just like Barrels are measured from the bolt face to the end of the barrel and/or permanently installed muzzle device.
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
Post Reply

Return to “Rifles & Shotguns”