Still, I figured he would be on the Guns Kill People bandwagon....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/639f0/639f0ab8dd62fe717e4f6a6491809a5a78e7b53c" alt="headscratch :headscratch"
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/20 ... p=features
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
SQLGeek wrote:I place more value on my dog's piles on the lawn than what Michael Moore has to say about any particular topic. He's a windbag that got rich on being controversial. That's all.
Only the good die young.rbraughn wrote:He hasn't had a heart attack yet?
We can always hope.rbraughn wrote:He hasn't had a heart attack yet?
I agree completely with your assement. I am just surprised to see that someone with far left leaning views on most things, and a Hollyweird background as well say anything that doesn't place responsibility for violence squarely on guns.jmra wrote:SQLGeek wrote:I place more value on my dog's piles on the lawn than what Michael Moore has to say about any particular topic. He's a windbag that got rich on being controversial. That's all.
Neither has Morgan Spurlock, which is surprising considering his "Super Size Me" documentary. As for Michael Moore, he is a complete tool but I'm surprised as anyone that he isn't placing the blame solely on inanimate objects.rbraughn wrote:He hasn't had a heart attack yet?
Here's one for Michael "Food doesn't make you fat, eating like a pig does"The Annoyed Man wrote:We can always hope.rbraughn wrote:He hasn't had a heart attack yet?