TexasCHLforum.com

So I had this thought that any post, regardless of how stupid it is, has the potential to yield multiple replies and to spawn all sorts of side discussions.

This is my way of testing that thought.

You are dead wrong, sir! And I resent the implications!!!

That took exactly one minute.


Amazing. I'm speechless.

The Annoyed Man wrote:You are dead wrong, sir! And I resent the implications!!!

We have now achieved multiple replies.

Side discussions to follow.

I don't think side discussions are allowed per PC 6432.0964 unless you have a "reasonable belief" that having such side discussion is required to maintain this thread

Thread hijack. Was the OP touch typing, or hunt-and-peck?

The moderators will love this one.

gigag04 wrote:So I had this thought that any post, regardless of how stupid it is, has the potential to yield multiple replies and to spawn all sorts of side discussions.

This is my way of testing that thought.

Here is the perfect example. http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=32638" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

WildBill wrote:

gigag04 wrote:So I had this thought that any post, regardless of how stupid it is, has the potential to yield multiple replies and to spawn all sorts of side discussions.

This is my way of testing that thought.

Here is the perfect example. http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=32638" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

On a related note, I have a new avatar.

And I was using proper typing form (previous life in IT...bleh).

gigag04 wrote: And I was using proper typing form (previous life in IT...bleh).

USA1 wrote:The moderators will love this one.

I don't *think* it violates any forum rules. I would let my hypothetical 10 yr old daughter read this thread.

gigag04 wrote:

USA1 wrote:The moderators will love this one.

I don't *think* it violates any forum rules.

Great, another cop who doesn't know the law but proceeds anyway ....



I kid I kid .... stop throwing tomatoes and nightsticks at me

gigag04 wrote: I don't *think* it violates any forum rules. I would let my hypothetical 10 yr old daughter read this thread.

But does it meet the standards of the Bill of Rights? Huh?

gigag04 wrote:

USA1 wrote:The moderators will love this one.

I don't *think* it violates any forum rules. I would let my hypothetical 10 yr old daughter read this thread.

Not so much any rule violation, but this thread should keepem on their toes.

*Keith B saying to himself*...."OK, lets see what these knuckle heads are up to today".