carlson1 wrote: I have had to work on our Church building more than once with graffiti.
You shouldn't have had to do that: the
tagger should have been the one out there with a wire brush, paint scraper, and power washer.
Damaging someone else's property should be handled as a tort first, and a crime second. The perpetrator in this case is headed to prison for 8 years, and the victims get nothing in return except a tax bill to pay for his incarceration. The victims still have to clean up the damage on their own, and they will have no way to seek redress since the state gets first dibs.