FBI asks you to look for extremism at home

[ScottDLS]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrew ... rch-users/

Keyword warrants given to Google.

Give us the name of everyone who searched for the name or an address during this time period.

Powerful tool.

This is interesting and makes a case for using privacy enhancing tools like a VPN in your internet browsing. It's also kind of scary that Google just keeps all that kind of data for any length of time. It's also not that easy to prove who made a particular query, but it's sure a head start in an investigation.

[Paladin]

The prosecution of GEN Flynn has to rank very high in the realm of dangerous extremism: Video of General Flynn discussing the why's of the conspiracy to destroy him

[Paladin]

New info on Stewart Rhodes: Federal Foreknowledge or Federal Incitement? Arrest of Green Beret Oath Keeper Threatens to Expose FBI’s Darkest 1/6 Secrets

The situation looks more damning by the day when it comes to the question of federal foreknowledge of and involvement in 1/6 at the very highest levels. Perhaps there is some as yet undiscovered innocent explanation for the glaring and seemingly damning questions raised above. If this is the case, it is time for the Justice Department and the FBI to explain themselves to the American people. We need answers. And we need them now.

[crazy2medic]

I would vote for Trump again in the hopes he would clean up the FBI and fire the top three echelons, appoint David Clarke as the director with orders to fix what's wrong!

[Paladin]

Found some more extremists:



During a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Oct 21, Representative Thomas Massie questioned Attorney General Merrick Garland about FBI agents and possible FBI informants planted in the crowd in DC to organize events.

Within the questioning, Massie presented Garland with a picture of Ray Epps, a former leader with the Arizona chapter of Oath Keepers attempting to agitate the crowd.

Massie also played a video, highlighting how Ray Epps was one of the key people trying to stir up trouble and create an agitated mob response. Ray Epps is an interesting possibility, because he was never arrested or charged by the FBI. As pointed out by Sean Davis on Twitter, “At one point, the FBI had his picture up on its page of people it wanted to question (Photograph 16). Not only was he not arrested, his picture was quietly removed from the FBI “Capitol Violence” page.”

The issues of Ray Epps not being arrested; and then his photograph mysteriously being removed; can be reconciled by a hypothesis that Epps was actually working for and operating with instructions from the FBI itself.

Below is the video that Thomas Massie shared….


Thank you Rep. Thomas Massie!

[Paladin]

Revolver found more info on Ray Epps: 'Fed-Protected' Man Identified As Mystery Instigator Of J6 Capitol Breach

[Paladin]

The revolver article also has more info on John Sullivan (aka Jayden X)

So to recap, months before January 6, John Sullivan was banned from Antifa groups on suspicions of being a fed: ...

Right now, John Sullivan is facing wrist-slap charges, was released immediately without bail. He then quickly breached those release conditions, but was given a highly unusual free pass by the judge.

It’s hard to find a genuinely peaceful MAGA protester who has been treated so kindly by the Justice Department. For example, the aforementioned Oath Keeper and Green Beret veteran Jeremy Brown is being held behind bars, his bail denied until trial, simply for standing 100 feet too close to the Capitol steps. To reiterate, Brown — unlike John Sullivan — never even went inside the Capitol on January 6.

[03Lightningrocks]

The leftist loons who voted for Biden think this garbage is real cool since the government is terrorizing Trump supporters. They are too ignorant to realize if they allow it when it happens to their perceived enemies, it will be their turn next.

[Paladin]

Who Is Ray Epps? (feat. Dr. Darren J. Beattie) – Firebrand with Matt Gaetz

DarrenJBeattie: “We were able to interpolate the exact day the FBI scrubbed Ray Epps from the Capitol Most Wanted List, and just by coincidence happened to be the very day after Revolver News ran an extensive piece on Stewart Rhodes.”

Since both Epps and Stewart Rhodes are leaders in Oathkeepers, as well as evidently on the FBI payroll, the extremists appear to be concealing these links.

[Paladin]

DEA agent charged in MAGA riot tells Tucker Carlson an FBI informant urged him to break into the Capitol

Ibrahim made the explosive claim that he was invited to attend Donald Trump's 'Stop The Steal' rally by an FBI informant he knew from his military service, who subsequently urged him to join the mob breaking into the Capitol, which he refused.

In the interests of truth we need to know the name of this extremist.

[2farnorth]

I think we found the extremists. They are the FBI. Now to get some one in office to root them out.

[Ruark]

I agree, the FBI is out of control. In the old days, we had an issue with some criminals (e.g. Dillinger, Bonnie & Clyde, et. al.) crossing state lines, creating confusion about whose jurisdiction was responsible for apprehending them. So they created the FBI, which focused on interstate crime. It's totally different now; we don't need them any more, they should be just dissolved.

[Paladin]

The FBI Just Admitted Something Terrifying and No One Seems to Be Noticing

The FBI’s presence in Kenosha sets off a cascade of questions, all of the answers to which should trigger every alarm in the book....

how many? Why did the FBI decide on that many drones? If that many drones, how many in each area? Why those areas? Was there some specific threat posed in those areas? Was local law enforcement involved? Were they aware? Did they have access to the video feed? Now again, out of an abundance of generosity, let’s assume those questions are answered in a way that justifies the reasons why, but what about the answer to the question: to what end? Were local authorities notified of crimes in progress? Were they dispatched to any of the areas where a crime in progress was occurring? How many crimes were stopped or prevented by the FBI drones?

We should consider that maybe that wasn’t the objective of the drones. Maybe they were just there to observe and then use the video to later arrest perpetrators of all of the riots and looting that occurred in Kenosha. Then how many arrests have occurred? How many people have been prosecuted as a result of the video? How many of the business owners have specific suspects they can pursue civil remedies against? Can we see the video from all of the drones from that night? What’s that….? The FBI has lost video from that night in this case? We do know that means the FBI has violated federal law, right?

[Paladin]

The Extremists have been busy, but fortunately an insider provided a protected disclosure:

FBI Whistleblower Reveals Biden DOJ Activated Counterterrorism Division Against Protesting Parents

"the FBI's Counterterrorism Division is compiling and categorizing threat assessments related to parents, including a document directing FBI personnel to use a specific "threat tag" to track potential investigations."

...The new information directly contradicts Garland's sworn testimony.

This is the smoking gun. Attorney General Garland provided zero evidence that parents are engaging in credible threats or acts of violence. And yet, he mobilized the FBI Counterterrorism Division to use counterterrorism tools for investigating, tracking, and tagging parents.

[Paladin]

DOJ Inspector General Says Department Must Address Concerns About Politicization

We believe that strengthening public trust in the Department is an urgent challenge that will continue to garner significant public attention, and that will require meaningful action from the Department. This challenge encompasses the important topics of demonstrating independence from political influence, providing leadership to the law enforcement community in protecting First Amendment activity while ensuring public safety, increasing transparency and accountability through implementation of a body worn camera program, and demonstrating the ability to effectively administer justice. Many of these issues are not new challenges, but recent events make the Department’s attention to them even more critical.

Its gonna take more than body cameras to hold these extremists accountable. They like to bury all the existing evidence as "national security", for example: U.S. Capitol Police Tell Federal Court January 6 Disturbance Videos Are Not Public Records