9 officers to be Punished for Ft Hood Shooting

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Barbi Q
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:17 pm

Re: 9 officers to be Punished for Ft Hood Shooting

#16

Post by Barbi Q »

b322da wrote:Not to offend those who have proudly served in the Army, whom I greatly respect, this case may point out a significant difference between its traditions and those of the naval services. In the latter the captain goes down with the ship. The commanding officer is held responsible for everything which happens on his ship, regardless of his personal involvement, and it flows uphill, not often downhill. The commanding officer, while not necessarily having committed an offense under the Code, is more often than not held responsible for not exercising appropriate leadership.

I have read that the most senior officer reprimanded in this case was a major. In the naval services one would expect to see the unit commander, regardless of rank, to "go down with his ship." I am not suggesting that the base commander had any personal shortfall here, but that often wouldn't matter in a naval service.

Elmo
In this case, it looks like the commanding officer and the commander in chief have decreed the buck stops somewhere else.
If anyone is raped, beaten or murdered on a college campus from this day forward
The senators who blocked SB 354 from being considered on 4/7/11 and
The members of the house calendar committee who haven't scheduled HB 750
Have the victims' blood on their hands.

b322da
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:34 am
Location: College Station, Texas

Re: 9 officers to be Punished for Ft Hood Shooting

#17

Post by b322da »

b322da wrote:Not to offend those who have proudly served in the Army, whom I greatly respect, this case may point out a significant difference between its traditions and those of the naval services. In the latter the captain goes down with the ship. The commanding officer is held responsible for everything which happens on his ship, regardless of his personal involvement, and it flows uphill, not often downhill. The commanding officer, while not necessarily having committed an offense under the Code, is more often than not held responsible for not exercising appropriate leadership.

I have read that the most senior officer reprimanded in this case was a major. In the naval services one would expect to see the unit commander, regardless of rank, to "go down with his ship." I am not suggesting that the base commander had any personal shortfall here, but that often wouldn't matter in a naval service.

Elmo
I couldn't help but recall my earlier post re: the Fort Hood shooting when I saw this article this morning:

http://www.globegazette.com/news/nation ... 7fd39.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I guess the captain goes up with the ship -- and gets a fourth star.

Elmo
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”