Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#301

Post by Oldgringo »

ScooterSissy wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Yeah, but 100% of the bikers shooting it out at Twin Peaks were bad guys and not choir boys.
What, exactly, makes them all "bad guys", and from where do you get your information?
{snip}
:mrgreen: "It only takes one bad apple to spoil the bushel", somebody said that.
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 73
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#302

Post by mojo84 »

ScooterSissy wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Yeah, but 100% of the bikers shooting it out at Twin Peaks were bad guys and not choir boys.
What, exactly, makes them all "bad guys", and from where do you get your information?

This was an announced CoC meeting. If you and your wife and a few other couples decided you wanted to start wearing a backpatch on leather vests with pretty pink ponies and a top rocker in gold lettering that said "Imagination Riders"; you very well might find yourself at a CoC meeting (just like this one) asking their permission.

That's one of problems with the way stories of this incident are being spread; people who think they know something, when they really don't.

It's the bottom territory rocker that matters. As long as the others don't copy the patches of the established gangs, they don't worry about it.

Also, because they think they can extort money from me because I put a Texas patch at the bottom of my vest at the risk of physical harm alone makes them bad guys.

The guys that were killed were all known biker gang members.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

ScooterSissy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 36
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#303

Post by ScooterSissy »

treadlightly wrote:You know, I think I know how to prevent more violence. The problem is gangs bickering over who owns Texas, right?

How 'bout we issue every DPS trooper a vest. Top rocker, 'DPS'. Main patch, the state seal. Bottom rocker? Of course, TEXAS.

I figure that would answer the question, and with the way group affiliation begats good times, the highways will be friendlier to boot.

What do you think? :biggrinjester:
Something similar has been done - check out the Blue Knights (Texas) ;)

ScooterSissy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 36
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#304

Post by ScooterSissy »

cb1000rider wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Would you guys be saying the same things about some of them being good guys if it was the Crips and Bloods that shot it out in a busy shopping center?
No.. and if that's really what they are, then I'd stand to be corrected... I just have trouble getting my head around that's what these 180 people happened to be - hard core criminals... The only real evidence seems to be wearing a patch, riding a motorcycle, and being present at a location where there was a gunfight... No doubt some of them are bad guys. They're basically charged due to wearing a patch. I mean if that's the way we're going to do it, lets go round up every bandana wearing hoodlum that there is - which would probably be a much more effective exercise...
I'm sort of late getting to this "party", but I was away from a computer all week, and just now catching up; so this may be ground already covered (as are some of my other comments).

There is more to this than just "wearing a patch and riding a motorcycle". That would be a riding club, not a motorcycle club. If you're a member of an RC (CMA for instance, or GWRRA) you show up, join, buy a patch, and start wearing it. If you are a member of an MC, you got to know members before you were allowed to be around them. You were around them before you got to be a prospect. You were a prospect before you became a member. You agreed to a lot of conditions before you did any of those things.

None of those MC members just showed up wearing a patch one day. Had they done so, it would have been removed, quickly.

This page - http://www.rcvsmc.net/id3.html - will explain the different attitudes about an RC and an MC. The whole site is a "long read", but some of you may find it of interest.

ScooterSissy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 36
Posts: 795
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:23 pm

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#305

Post by ScooterSissy »

mojo84 wrote:
ScooterSissy wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Yeah, but 100% of the bikers shooting it out at Twin Peaks were bad guys and not choir boys.
What, exactly, makes them all "bad guys", and from where do you get your information?

This was an announced CoC meeting. If you and your wife and a few other couples decided you wanted to start wearing a backpatch on leather vests with pretty pink ponies and a top rocker in gold lettering that said "Imagination Riders"; you very well might find yourself at a CoC meeting (just like this one) asking their permission.

That's one of problems with the way stories of this incident are being spread; people who think they know something, when they really don't.

It's the bottom territory rocker that matters. As long as the others don't copy the patches of the established gangs, they don't worry about it.

Also, because they think they can extort money from me because I put a Texas patch at the bottom of my vest at the risk of physical harm alone makes them bad guys.

The guys that were killed were all known biker gang members.
My apologies - You said "100% of the bikers shooting it out", and somehow my brain quick scanned it into reading "100% of the bikers there". It was a mistake on my part.

I agree, those involved in the shoot out were most likely bad guys, to one degree or another. I don't know that everyone present was.

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 8400
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#306

Post by Abraham »

1 percenter bikers...

Middle age to elderly dirtbags on motorcycles with an average maturity of a retarded 12 year old...

What's not to admire...?
User avatar

ShootDontTalk
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 18
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 7:56 pm
Location: Near Houston

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#307

Post by ShootDontTalk »

ScooterSissy wrote: This was an announced CoC meeting. If you and your wife and a few other couples decided you wanted to start wearing a backpatch on leather vests with pretty pink ponies and a top rocker in gold lettering that said "Imagination Riders"; you very well might find yourself at a CoC meeting (just like this one) asking their permission.
Just a question here. If I go out and buy a $40,000 motorcycle for my wife and myself, spend thousands of dollars for matching "biker gear" at the Harley dealer, and wear leather jackets with whatever I want on them, why do I then need to ask permission of anyone?

IMHO there are a lot of hairs being split here. If I wear a Texas rocker on a jacket and someone politely asks me to take it off, I will probably smile and walk away. If they ORDER me to take it off or pay for the privilege of wearing it at the threat of violence, they are going to get a rather different reaction. People who do such things commit extortion. I think going to a meeting where such concepts are even hinted at would be risky. Am I wrong?
"When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!
Eli Wallach on concealed carry while taking a bubble bath
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 15
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#308

Post by Oldgringo »

Setting aside the issues of shootings, stabbings and other questionable activities for a moment, why do the biker's cycles have to be so aggressively loud? The Honda Gold Wings have a very friendly sound.
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#309

Post by WildBill »

Oldgringo wrote:Setting aside the issues of shootings, stabbings and other questionable activities for a moment, why do the biker's cycles have to be so aggressively loud? The Honda Gold Wings have a very friendly sound.
I have wondered the same thing. Maybe they want to be noticed.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 5038
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#310

Post by RPBrown »

AndyC wrote:"Loud pipes save lives" - I have some empathy for that, having being almost sideswiped by cars as a youngster.
:iagree:
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 7875
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#311

Post by anygunanywhere »

Abraham wrote:1 percenter bikers...

Middle age to elderly dirtbags on motorcycles with an average maturity of a retarded 12 year old...

What's not to admire...?
Mid-life crisis to the extreme?
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar

Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#312

Post by Pawpaw »

AndyC wrote:"Loud pipes save lives" - I have some empathy for that, having being almost sideswiped by cars as a youngster.
I had an incident years ago where even my loud pipes (tips w/o mufflers) wouldn't wake up the old couple in a '57 Chevy, but a brogan to the front door sure did! :mad5
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams

jason812
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1534
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Shooting at Twin Peaks in Waco

#313

Post by jason812 »

Oldgringo wrote:Setting aside the issues of shootings, stabbings and other questionable activities for a moment, why do the biker's cycles have to be so aggressively loud? The Honda Gold Wings have a very friendly sound.
If it's too loud, you're too old, "rlol" I think bikes need to have some noise to them but a stock Honda is too quiet and I've heard some bikes that are way too loud. With that being said, I miss my bike that I got rid of 15 years ago but no way I would ride on the street any more. Wish I wouldn't get hurt any more and I'd have another dirt bike in a second. Got rid of that 5 years ago, maybe it took me a while to grow up.

I find it absurd that you have to pay protection money to wear a patch on a leather jacket or Canadian tuxedo. I've heard that even the Christian clubs have to pay these scum bags.

In a coming police auction, there will be plenty of scooters to bid on.
In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law to pursue a natural justice.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”