Kim Jong Il - dead

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#16

Post by ELB »

So far everyone is seems to be assuming Kim Jong Il died on his own natural causes (his diabetes and heart disease), and that now a power struggle might erupt to see who succeeds him.

Alternate possibility: Old Kim was in poor health, weak; power struggle occurred and new leader is decided; Kim Jong Il's death of natural causes -- with a little nudge -- is the last step. This is a not-unknown succession strategy in these kinds of regimes... ;-)

Further wild but plausible speculation: New leader may or may not be the son; he may be a figurehead for public consumption after he cut a deal to not immediately occupy the grave next to his father. :evil2:
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#17

Post by Oldgringo »

Image

Good Riddance!
User avatar

Lambda Force
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:18 pm

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#18

Post by Lambda Force »

It sounds like it's time for me to watch Team America again.

Image
Tyranny is identified by what is legal for government employees but illegal for the citizenry.
User avatar

fulano
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 323
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:46 pm

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#19

Post by fulano »

Lambda Force wrote:It sounds like it's time for me to watch Team America again.

Image
:iagree:
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they don't want to hear." George Orwell 1903-1950

SlickTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Coppell, TX

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#20

Post by SlickTX »

I read an article by the UK's past ambassador to North Korea where he says the son is even nuttier than the father. Based on that kinda-insider view, I'm not holding my breath for any changes over there.

Another article listed all the troops, tanks, APC's, artillery tubes, etc. that the North has which outnumber the South's by 3 or 4 to 1, then stated that the hardware was about 1965 vintage. Other than the human wave potential, the North really doesn't stack up.
[Insert pithy witicism here]

Proudly carrying since 09/10.

thebigapp
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:09 pm
Location: Spring, TX

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#21

Post by thebigapp »

:iagree:

Son could be even more dangerous! Sure do hope current administration is carefully watching this situation.

bayouhazard
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 823
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:30 pm
Location: Wild West Houston

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#22

Post by bayouhazard »

ELB wrote:So far everyone is seems to be assuming Kim Jong Il died on his own natural causes (his diabetes and heart disease), and that now a power struggle might erupt to see who succeeds him.

Alternate possibility: Old Kim was in poor health, weak; power struggle occurred and new leader is decided; Kim Jong Il's death of natural causes -- with a little nudge -- is the last step. This is a not-unknown succession strategy in these kinds of regimes... ;-)

Further wild but plausible speculation: New leader may or may not be the son; he may be a figurehead for public consumption after he cut a deal to not immediately occupy the grave next to his father. :evil2:
It could be some faction want the son on the throne as a puppet. The risk is the puppet deciding he wants to be a real boy.

wheelgun1958
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1125
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:40 pm
Location: Flo, TX

Re: Kim Jong Il - dead

#23

Post by wheelgun1958 »

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”