So far everyone is seems to be assuming Kim Jong Il died on his own natural causes (his diabetes and heart disease), and that now a power struggle might erupt to see who succeeds him.
Alternate possibility: Old Kim was in poor health, weak; power struggle occurred and new leader is decided; Kim Jong Il's death of natural causes -- with a little nudge -- is the last step. This is a not-unknown succession strategy in these kinds of regimes...
Further wild but plausible speculation: New leader may or may not be the son; he may be a figurehead for public consumption after he cut a deal to not immediately occupy the grave next to his father.
Kim Jong Il - dead
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Kim Jong Il - dead
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 11203
- Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
- Location: Pineywoods of east Texas
Re: Kim Jong Il - dead
Good Riddance!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: Kim Jong Il - dead
It sounds like it's time for me to watch Team America again.
Tyranny is identified by what is legal for government employees but illegal for the citizenry.
Re: Kim Jong Il - dead
Lambda Force wrote:It sounds like it's time for me to watch Team America again.
"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they don't want to hear." George Orwell 1903-1950
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:43 pm
- Location: Coppell, TX
Re: Kim Jong Il - dead
I read an article by the UK's past ambassador to North Korea where he says the son is even nuttier than the father. Based on that kinda-insider view, I'm not holding my breath for any changes over there.
Another article listed all the troops, tanks, APC's, artillery tubes, etc. that the North has which outnumber the South's by 3 or 4 to 1, then stated that the hardware was about 1965 vintage. Other than the human wave potential, the North really doesn't stack up.
Another article listed all the troops, tanks, APC's, artillery tubes, etc. that the North has which outnumber the South's by 3 or 4 to 1, then stated that the hardware was about 1965 vintage. Other than the human wave potential, the North really doesn't stack up.
[Insert pithy witicism here]
Proudly carrying since 09/10.
Proudly carrying since 09/10.
Re: Kim Jong Il - dead
Son could be even more dangerous! Sure do hope current administration is carefully watching this situation.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:30 pm
- Location: Wild West Houston
Re: Kim Jong Il - dead
It could be some faction want the son on the throne as a puppet. The risk is the puppet deciding he wants to be a real boy.ELB wrote:So far everyone is seems to be assuming Kim Jong Il died on his own natural causes (his diabetes and heart disease), and that now a power struggle might erupt to see who succeeds him.
Alternate possibility: Old Kim was in poor health, weak; power struggle occurred and new leader is decided; Kim Jong Il's death of natural causes -- with a little nudge -- is the last step. This is a not-unknown succession strategy in these kinds of regimes...
Further wild but plausible speculation: New leader may or may not be the son; he may be a figurehead for public consumption after he cut a deal to not immediately occupy the grave next to his father.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:40 pm
- Location: Flo, TX