AZ's "new" immigration law

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

VoiceofReason
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1748
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#31

Post by VoiceofReason »

AEA wrote:Now, Texas needs to step up!
Texas no longer has the guts.

Our Governor and state elected officials haven’t even stood up to support Arizona.

Texas should boycott those states that are boycotting Arizona.
God Bless America, and please hurry.
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
User avatar

Kevinf2349
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1090
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#32

Post by Kevinf2349 »

VoiceofReason wrote:
AEA wrote:Now, Texas needs to step up!
Texas no longer has the guts.

Our Governor and state elected officials haven’t even stood up to support Arizona.

Texas should boycott those states that are boycotting Arizona.
:iagree: Amen.

I am looking for a list of companies that I need to boycott for boycotting AZ too. Hit 'em in their pocket book. :totap: To me them boycotting is tantamount to them supporting criminals.
Glock - When a FTF just isn't an option!

04/24/09 - CHL Class
08/17/09 - Plastic in hand!

NRA & TSRA Member

Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

"Society doesn't have a gun problem; Society has a society problem"
User avatar

Mando'a
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Round Rock, TX

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#33

Post by Mando'a »

Just heard on the newz today that Austin City Council, has decided to not do any business with AZ.

The reporter then said, Austin currently does not do any business with AZ.

I believe it was CNN
took chl renewal course 11/7/09
sent in paperwork 11/12/09
received new chl 12/09/09

NRA member
Glock 22
Bushmaster Texas Carbine (XM15-E2S)
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#34

Post by Purplehood »

Mando'a wrote:Just heard on the newz today that Austin City Council, has decided to not do any business with AZ.

The reporter then said, Austin currently does not do any business with AZ.

I believe it was CNN
I believe that the city of Austin is actually a colony of the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia. That may explain things.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar

Mando'a
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Round Rock, TX

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#35

Post by Mando'a »

sorry, it was a travel ban.


http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/local/aust ... travel-ban" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
took chl renewal course 11/7/09
sent in paperwork 11/12/09
received new chl 12/09/09

NRA member
Glock 22
Bushmaster Texas Carbine (XM15-E2S)
User avatar

Mando'a
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Round Rock, TX

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#36

Post by Mando'a »

Purplehood wrote:
Mando'a wrote:Just heard on the newz today that Austin City Council, has decided to not do any business with AZ.

The reporter then said, Austin currently does not do any business with AZ.

I believe it was CNN
I believe that the city of Austin is actually a colony of the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia. That may explain things.
:iagree:

Good to see you back on the forum!!
took chl renewal course 11/7/09
sent in paperwork 11/12/09
received new chl 12/09/09

NRA member
Glock 22
Bushmaster Texas Carbine (XM15-E2S)

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#37

Post by RPB »

Purplehood wrote:
Mando'a wrote:Just heard on the newz today that Austin City Council, has decided to not do any business with AZ.

The reporter then said, Austin currently does not do any business with AZ.

I believe it was CNN
I believe that the city of Austin is actually a colony of the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia. That may explain things.
True, I'm headed to Houston, maybe San Marcos too, in a few weeks, to shop at Austin Kayak (branch stores out in those other cities) because I want none of my sales tax money going to Austin if they boycott AZ, I'll boycott Austin... (Sorry Jeff... Manager of the Austin store)

Anything I can buy online from AZ will be bought there too instead of some other State. I won't mind paying the Texas sales and Use Tax ... I just don't want the city of Austin getting any if they continue on that Anti-American path of boycotting those trying to stop criminals and enforce laws and make the streets safer for those here legally who pay for the service of them attempting to provide better security for us.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

Tregs
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:47 pm
Location: Carrollton

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#38

Post by Tregs »

I've taken this route too. When buying online, I look for companies in AZ. Not that I'm voting against Texas :txflag: with my dollars, just that AZ needs some love. It's the "helping a brother out" attitude. :patriot:
I heard on a news show last night that 93% of the population agrees with AZ, but that statistic never makes the news. Maybe because it's a difficult statistic to defend. (who was polled, which demographic, etc).

Edited to correct a typo from 63% to 93%. Darn these small keyboards.
Last edited by Tregs on Fri May 14, 2010 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#39

Post by RPB »

Tregs wrote:I've taken this route too. When buying online, I look for companies in AZ. Not that I'm voting against Texas :txflag: with my dollars, just that AZ needs some love. It's the "helping a brother out" attitude. :patriot:
I heard on a news show last night that 63% of the population agrees with AZ, but that statistic never makes the news. Maybe because it's a difficult statistic to defend. (who was polled, which demographic, etc).
Speaking of Polls/Statistics results which get surpressed, you might enjoy this http://action.afa.net/Blogs/BlogPost.aspx?id=2147494420" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Whoops! LA Times own poll: 98% of readers think Arizona boycott a bad idea
(And the city of Austin wants to copy the bad idea? :smilelol5: )
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

VoiceofReason
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1748
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: South Texas

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#40

Post by VoiceofReason »

I won’t be going to Austin. When I get the chance, I will send some e-mails to the Austin city government and chamber of commerce to let them know this. :mad5

They want to play those games-let’s play. :patriot: :txflag:
God Bless America, and please hurry.
When I was young I knew all the answers. When I got older I started to realize I just hadn’t quite understood the questions.-Me
User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#41

Post by SQLGeek »

Ah yes, Austin quit trying to be San Francisco. They already made that move and are making themselves look like fools, even in the eyes of many of my liberal friends.

Since we're talking Arizona companies, I can't recommend http://www.jgsales.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; enough for your gun and ammo needs.
Psalm 91:2

gemini
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:01 pm

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#42

Post by gemini »

SGCUSA.COM ................ Scottsdale Gun Club ..............
I ordered PMC .380 ammo from them a few weeks ago. They delivered
as promised and on time. Price $13.99 per box of 50.
They look to be "out of stock" currently. However, they are in Az and I will
do business with them again in the future.
I'm all for Arizona having the guts to enforce the law, since the Federal agencys
won't. Wish Texas would follow the Az lead.
I'm ashamed of Austin.
User avatar

nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#43

Post by nitrogen »

I'd much rather Arizona goes after people that employ illegal immigrants. I'd like to see a one million dollar fine for each year an illegal immigrant was working for an employer. If the demand for illegal workers dries up, they'll stop coming.

Not that this is a bad idea either. If the federal government isn't going to do anything, the state has to do something.
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous

Frost
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 1:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#44

Post by Frost »

Why is it that if i move across town it is called moving and no one cares, but if i move across an imaginary line drawn by politicians it is called immigration and everyone freaks out if i don't fill out some paper work?
It can happen here.

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: AZ's "new" immigration law

#45

Post by RPB »

Frost wrote:Why is it that if i move across town it is called moving and no one cares, but if i move across an imaginary line drawn by politicians it is called immigration and everyone freaks out if i don't fill out some paper work?
Sometimes boundaries/imaginary lines are important if there are differeing rules on the other side, such as at secured areas of airports, boundaries at USACE properties, State lines which prohibit magazines over 10 rounds .... or, filling out paperwork to enjoy more benefits on the other side of the line ....
I don't necessarily agree nor disagree with the right or wrongness of those lines, but even the Indian tribes and animals have had territorial boundaries since creation.... I guess that's just how it is.... May as well abide by the rules, be legal instead of a criminal tresspasser, so the bigger indian tribe/pack of wolves doesn't bite..... I guess that's just how it is....
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”