disclosure of medical records to employer

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


chabouk
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:01 am

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#16

Post by chabouk »

Where I work, it's now a condition of employment that during our five year background checks, we sign a medical release form. By HIPAA, that release has to be for a specific purpose, and in our case it authorizes the keeper of any such records to disclose mental health or drug abuse issues. (We also have pre-employment drug screening, and random drug tests, but I've never been randomly tested in over 15 years.)

I haven't had any mental health issues, nor used illegal drugs. The only time I've been to the doctor in over 10 years was a work-related injury, so there's nothing for them to even look for.

And besides, they might have permission to look, but they don't know where to look. ;-)
User avatar

Big Tuna
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:46 pm

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#17

Post by Big Tuna »

57Coastie wrote:I suspect that we are back into the old question of, "Do you want to stand on your principles, or do you want a job?" Like it or not, there are an awful lot of folks out there today who need a job, at the same time as the cost of health insurance has skyrocketed to the point where more employers feel obliged to look into the hidden costs to his business which may be caused by a new employee. Right or wrong, I do believe that as a practical matter we can expect this.
By that reasoning, a company could discriminate against women because pregnancy and child birth is expensive. Not just the medical costs, but potential time off work.
User avatar

marksiwel
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1964
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Cedar Park/Austin

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#18

Post by marksiwel »

Big Tuna wrote:
57Coastie wrote:I suspect that we are back into the old question of, "Do you want to stand on your principles, or do you want a job?" Like it or not, there are an awful lot of folks out there today who need a job, at the same time as the cost of health insurance has skyrocketed to the point where more employers feel obliged to look into the hidden costs to his business which may be caused by a new employee. Right or wrong, I do believe that as a practical matter we can expect this.
By that reasoning, a company could discriminate against women because pregnancy and child birth is expensive. Not just the medical costs, but potential time off work.
Um...they allready do that. Its just not official. Basically when the wife finishes law school she will have to go out of her way to mention that I am going to be a stay at home dad, so that she wont be discriminated against.
Also, compared to the rest of the Western World, Maternity leave in the US is a joke.
In Capitalism, Man exploits Man. In Communism, it's just the reverse
User avatar

Dragonfighter
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2315
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
Contact:

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#19

Post by Dragonfighter »

I work in a field in which a degree of physical ability is required and we were submitted for physicals and back x-rays. We also completed psych profiles and medical "questionnaires" . Also in my position semi-annual physicals were required. Random an fairly frequent drug testing is also a reality. But with all this scrutiny, there was never a request for a general release for any and all medical records; and this was before HIPPA (and the vague "job suitabilty" counts as a specific resaon for HIPPA).

If that ever becomes a condition for continued employment, I agree with TAM, "they can pound sand". Hey that almost rhymes.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut

TheBrit
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:41 pm

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#20

Post by TheBrit »

marksiwel wrote:What you dont want the government to have your DNA and Fingerprints on file? Now can I see your papers citizen?
Thats funny. As part of my US citizenship application I had to undergo a background check and then biometric collection.
Here is the kicker, I'm a now a US citizen, but apparently a second rate US citizen. The FBI holds a file on me, although I have never been convicted of a crime. My fingerprints, iris scan, and picture are in a government held database even though I am not a threat to the government and willingly pledged my allegiance to this great country. One would have imagined after I was accepted as a US citizen I would have the same rights as my fellow countrymen, my file deleted. Most of us here are of immigrant decent, I was just a few hundreds years later than most.
Is Freedom Free? No.
Don't get me wrong I love being a US citizen, and knowingly accepted I would be indexed and filed. I'm just saying that sometimes we have to do things we don't want to do in order to see the bigger picture. Maybe I'll live long enough to see a change in immigration law were a US citizen is just that. When "WE THE PEOPLE" applies to all of us. I suspect I won't. I've seen a government turn against its people, take their guns, their liberty, their freedom. Orwellian indeed!

God Bless America, and her Constitution that keeps us the worlds freest nation! Lets not lose sight of what we have here.

On a side note - If it was ever discovered a clerical error had been made on my 4 year long application process, say for example a clerk entered the wrong date on a form, I could be denaturalized at any time. Even if I lived here for 60 years or more. Kinda scary....
"Liberty And Justice For All"*

* Not available in all states. Void where prohibited by law.

Image
User avatar

marksiwel
Banned
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1964
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:35 pm
Location: Cedar Park/Austin

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#21

Post by marksiwel »

TheBrit wrote:
marksiwel wrote:What you dont want the government to have your DNA and Fingerprints on file? Now can I see your papers citizen?
Thats funny. As part of my US citizenship application I had to undergo a background check and then biometric collection.
Here is the kicker, I'm a now a US citizen, but apparently a second rate US citizen. The FBI holds a file on me, although I have never been convicted of a crime. My fingerprints, iris scan, and picture are in a government held database even though I am not a threat to the government and willingly pledged my allegiance to this great country. One would have imagined after I was accepted as a US citizen I would have the same rights as my fellow countrymen, my file deleted. Most of us here are of immigrant decent, I was just a few hundreds years later than most.
Is Freedom Free? No.
Don't get me wrong I love being a US citizen, and knowingly accepted I would be indexed and filed. I'm just saying that sometimes we have to do things we don't want to do in order to see the bigger picture. Maybe I'll live long enough to see a change in immigration law were a US citizen is just that. When "WE THE PEOPLE" applies to all of us. I suspect I won't. I've seen a government turn against its people, take their guns, their liberty, their freedom. Orwellian indeed!

God Bless America, and her Constitution that keeps us the worlds freest nation! Lets not lose sight of what we have here.

On a side note - If it was ever discovered a clerical error had been made on my 4 year long application process, say for example a clerk entered the wrong date on a form, I could be denaturalized at any time. Even if I lived here for 60 years or more. Kinda scary....
I have a friend who got kicked out (he later came back) because they were too lazy to file his Visa renewal. Good times
In Capitalism, Man exploits Man. In Communism, it's just the reverse

57Coastie

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#22

Post by 57Coastie »

TheBrit wrote: One would have imagined after I was accepted as a US citizen I would have the same rights as my fellow countrymen, my file deleted.
I might question your assumption, Brit, that native born citizens have their "file deleted" once one is generated by the FBI for some reason, legitimately or not, and one need not have committed a crime to have that file generated. I have had some personal experience in that respect.

Jim
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#23

Post by jimlongley »

The Annoyed Man wrote:It may also be illegal. Collecting DNA without a warrant? For what possible purpose? I find it repulsive also.
Maybe they are collecting it so that if you turn out to be a superb worker, they can clone you.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: disclosure of medical records to employer

#24

Post by Keith B »

jimlongley wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:It may also be illegal. Collecting DNA without a warrant? For what possible purpose? I find it repulsive also.
Maybe they are collecting it so that if you turn out to be a superb worker, they can clone you.
If that is the case, I wish they would hurry up; I could use the help!! :lol:
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”