Bubba, I stated that I realized that the citizen gave consent. I know that his 4th was not violated.bubba84 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:36 pmThe 4th wasn't violated as he had consent.anygunanywhere wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:39 pmI realize the citizen gave consent.
Shouldn’t the normal situation be that there is RAS or PC before a cop wants to search law abiding citizens?
Why did he want to run the weapon? What led him to think it might be stolen? Does the deputy make it a habit of pulling these unnecessary searches on all citizens exercising their 2A rights? The 4A protects against these searches.
My point is what is in large red text. Why did the deputy believe it was necessary to run the weapon to see if it was stolen? He had no PC or RAS.