Recounts?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Banned
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: Recounts?
Hildebeast is joining in
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/26/politics/ ... index.html
What about respecting and accepting the results of the election?
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/26/politics/ ... index.html
What about respecting and accepting the results of the election?
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
Re: Recounts?
Just a leftist drama and waste of money.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:58 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
Re: Recounts?
Clinton campaign will participate in Wisconsin recount, with an eye on ‘outside interference,’ lawyer says.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 5e89b2cc0a
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 5e89b2cc0a
Revolver - An elegant weapon... for a more civilized age.
NRA Endowment Life Member
TSRA Life Member
NRA Endowment Life Member
TSRA Life Member
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
- Location: North Dallas
Re: Recounts?

"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6745
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
- Location: Hunt County
Re: Recounts?
But no eye on "inside interference", like from the DNC,dhoobler wrote:Clinton campaign will participate in Wisconsin recount, with an eye on ‘outside interference,’ lawyer says.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pos ... 5e89b2cc0a
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
Re: Recounts?
It's not their money and maybe they can tamper with enough ballots this time, like LBJ.parabelum wrote:Just a leftist drama and waste of money.
-
Topic author - Banned
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 4:21 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: Recounts?
Let's call for recounts in all of those states too. Equally waste everyone's time.Bitter Clinger wrote:
TSRA Member since 5/30/15; NRA Member since 10/31/14
Re: Recounts?
Think about the statement below:
"We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states -- Michigan -- well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount,“ Elias said. "
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic ... e-recounts
It's all a sham. These rats crave attention, desperately.
"We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states -- Michigan -- well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount,“ Elias said. "
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic ... e-recounts
It's all a sham. These rats crave attention, desperately.
Re: Recounts?
That's how liberals roll, the epitome of corruption.satcong wrote:It's not their money and maybe they can tamper with enough ballots this time, like LBJ.parabelum wrote:Just a leftist drama and waste of money.
Re: Recounts?
Whining about Hillary winning the "popular vote" so she should be President. Sorry. That isn't the way it works. Are you too stupid to understand that?
Members of the electoral college receiving death threats. I guess tolerance only goes one way. Libs have no tolerance for opinions other than their own.
Hillary, who tried to trap Trump into saying he would respect the results, is now participating in "recounts". Recounts that won't change a thing. Sore looser.
News flash snowflake. Your socialist / communist candidate LOST. GET OVER IT. The democratic process worked. Just because it didn't have the result you felt entitled to isn't an excuse for the way you're acting. If it will make you feel better you can have a ribbon for participation.
Why are the states for democrats blue and the republican states red? I thought socialist / communist colors were always red? I demand it be changed! Otherwise I'm going to go block a street and cry until I get my way!
It is always referred to as the "democratic" party. Nothing "democratic" about it. We live in a democratic society. We have republicans and democrats.
Members of the electoral college receiving death threats. I guess tolerance only goes one way. Libs have no tolerance for opinions other than their own.
Hillary, who tried to trap Trump into saying he would respect the results, is now participating in "recounts". Recounts that won't change a thing. Sore looser.
News flash snowflake. Your socialist / communist candidate LOST. GET OVER IT. The democratic process worked. Just because it didn't have the result you felt entitled to isn't an excuse for the way you're acting. If it will make you feel better you can have a ribbon for participation.
Why are the states for democrats blue and the republican states red? I thought socialist / communist colors were always red? I demand it be changed! Otherwise I'm going to go block a street and cry until I get my way!
It is always referred to as the "democratic" party. Nothing "democratic" about it. We live in a democratic society. We have republicans and democrats.
If you're standing still, you're loosing.
Re: Recounts?
Years ago it was that way, Republican blue/Democrat red. I don't remember the year it was changed.doncb wrote:
Why are the states for democrats blue and the republican states red? I thought socialist / communist colors were always red?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 3:44 pm
Re: Recounts?
I'm glad the traitor lost.
I may be wrong, if I am please explain but, I thought that the recount was not financed by
taxpayer money but instead by 'donations' collected from private sources. Stein did come
up w the money awfully quick but, I still don't see Trump losing very many votes or hrc
gaining enough to bother w a recount. That being said (realizing that much will go directly
into some chronies pocket) a portion of that $4-6 million will go back into the economy
in the form of someones neighbor buying groceries. True or not ?


I may be wrong, if I am please explain but, I thought that the recount was not financed by
taxpayer money but instead by 'donations' collected from private sources. Stein did come
up w the money awfully quick but, I still don't see Trump losing very many votes or hrc
gaining enough to bother w a recount. That being said (realizing that much will go directly
into some chronies pocket) a portion of that $4-6 million will go back into the economy
in the form of someones neighbor buying groceries. True or not ?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6745
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
- Location: Hunt County
Re: Recounts?
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/w ... 104176297/John Galt wrote:Years ago it was that way, Republican blue/Democrat red. I don't remember the year it was changed.doncb wrote:
Why are the states for democrats blue and the republican states red? I thought socialist / communist colors were always red?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... al-colors/
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
Re: Recounts?
I don't think so. If they were truly so concerned with their Lib voter base, they wouldn't have cheated ol' Commie Bernie out of the process.pushpullpete wrote:I'm glad the traitor lost.
![]()
![]()
I may be wrong, if I am please explain but, I thought that the recount was not financed by
taxpayer money but instead by 'donations' collected from private sources. Stein did come
up w the money awfully quick but, I still don't see Trump losing very many votes or hrc
gaining enough to bother w a recount. That being said (realizing that much will go directly
into some chronies pocket) a portion of that $4-6 million will go back into the economy
in the form of someones neighbor buying groceries. True or not ?
Now there's a recount that witch ought to be alright with...

Progs have always been for themselves only. They are the enemy within.
Re: Recounts?
Reading some of the comments by those in the Clinton camp, they just won't let it go. They just can't accept the reality that she lost. I have a relative that is a flaming liberal that actually had to take anxiety medication after the election. I don't think he will ever accept the results. He'd probably send money for the recount.parabelum wrote:Think about the statement below:
"We do so fully aware that the number of votes separating Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the closest of these states -- Michigan -- well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount,“ Elias said. "
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/artic ... e-recounts
It's all a sham. These rats crave attention, desperately.
If you're standing still, you're loosing.