California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
Ah, maybe I'm just being complacent, but I don't care what California does anymore that I care what Albania does...
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
We actually had a SCOTUS ruling on this that they can't search your phone without a warrant. It came after the state court of kommiefornia ruled police could, and Ohio I believe that said police couldn't. Even more surprising from SCOTUS was that it was a unanimous decision.Papa_Tiger wrote:<sarcasm> No, you are looking at this all wrong. This is just a tool to aid law enforcement. It doesn't matter if they can search your phone without a warrant if they can't decrypt it. This will rightly allow them access to all the data on your phone when they execute their valid warrantless search. </sarcasm>
NRA Benefactor Member
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 17350
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
First of all, I don't think it will pass. At least I really hope not.Abraham wrote:Ah, maybe I'm just being complacent, but I don't care what California does anymore that I care what Albania does...
But if it did it could cause some issues with phone manufacturers having to make California Compliant phones.
It would be a logistical nightmare to try to keep track of them, so a company might decide to make all of their phones California compliant.
NRA Endowment Member
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:45 pm
- Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
- Contact:
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
So the only actual encryption on an iphone is the password? And if you have disabled the password requirement so that you can just go right into your phone each time, there is no encryption?
God and the soldier we adore,
In times of danger, not before.
The danger gone, the trouble righted,
God's forgotten, the soldier slighted.
In times of danger, not before.
The danger gone, the trouble righted,
God's forgotten, the soldier slighted.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 17350
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
The password is not the encryption.RossA wrote:So the only actual encryption on an iphone is the password? And if you have disabled the password requirement so that you can just go right into your phone each time, there is no encryption?
The password allows you to recover data that has been encrypted.
When you back up your phone on your computer or the cloud to can choose whether or not to encrypt certain data.
http://bgr.com/2016/01/22/iphone-androi ... -password/
NRA Endowment Member
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
I hate to be the one to break it to you, but there's nothing on your cell now that can't be accessed by the provider or an agency with the tech.Solaris wrote:Within in 10 years, all cellphones will have a backdoor for GOVT access. Get your pre-ban while you can. I am amazed Apple has held out so long.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 5072
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
My Android is memory encrypted with 256 bit cipher. Can you point to a case where someone has cracked with a brute force attack?Taypo wrote:I hate to be the one to break it to you, but there's nothing on your cell now that can't be accessed by the provider or an agency with the tech.Solaris wrote:Within in 10 years, all cellphones will have a backdoor for GOVT access. Get your pre-ban while you can. I am amazed Apple has held out so long.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
Terrible bagels? You can't get a good garlic bagel in California. Reason enough not to go back.WildBill wrote:California: home of the world's biggest technology companies, terrible bagels, and the only place that can suffer both drought and floods at the same time.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 903
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:45 pm
- Location: Houston, Republic of Texas
- Contact:
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
Haven't there been instances where hackers have even broken into government databases? I would have to assume that those databases are pretty highly "protected." If hackers can get into those, I don't see why they couldn't get into someone's cell phone.
God and the soldier we adore,
In times of danger, not before.
The danger gone, the trouble righted,
God's forgotten, the soldier slighted.
In times of danger, not before.
The danger gone, the trouble righted,
God's forgotten, the soldier slighted.
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
I'm not talking about brute force. I'm talking about avoiding the phone altogether. Provider side will provide records, locations, texts, emails, etc. Honeypots or any of the other methods for pulling down voice.ScottDLS wrote:My Android is memory encrypted with 256 bit cipher. Can you point to a case where someone has cracked with a brute force attack?Taypo wrote:I hate to be the one to break it to you, but there's nothing on your cell now that can't be accessed by the provider or an agency with the tech.Solaris wrote:Within in 10 years, all cellphones will have a backdoor for GOVT access. Get your pre-ban while you can. I am amazed Apple has held out so long.
Here's an example for you: The Couch kid was busted when mom ordered a pizza delivered. How do you think they got that info?
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
Mmmmm, bagels. I don't miss NY much, but bagels is one of those things that makes me wish I was closer...rotor wrote:Terrible bagels? You can't get a good garlic bagel in California. Reason enough not to go back.WildBill wrote:California: home of the world's biggest technology companies, terrible bagels, and the only place that can suffer both drought and floods at the same time.
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
On android phones there is a separate step that must be taken to encrypt the phone. The device has to be charged and plugged in and it can take an hour to do.koine2002 wrote:I don't know about Android phones. However, on an iPhone, the passcode is the encryption. That's the number (simple) or password (complex) one enters to unlock the decice. Apple has said they don't have the ability to, with the current coding, to overcome a user's passcode. They have refused to write a back door into the OS to allow themselves to do so. Such a back door can be exploited by a hacker.RossA wrote:So for non-techie people like me, what the heck does this mean? Is my phone that I bought from Verizon encrypted? If a cop gets my phone, he can just look at what's on there without any fancy tech stuff happening. Just like I do every time I pick it up.
It can slow down an Older device but with a newer one you might not notice.
One huge is that if you lose your phone and someone else finds it they will not be an able to get into it even if they plug it into a computer. I would highly recommend encrypting any phone.
https://www.google.com/search?q=how+to+encrypt+android
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
Properly utilized, authorities nor Apple can break into an iphone. Steve Cook and James Comey unanimously agree on this. Certain messaging apps are are also undecryptable.Taypo wrote:I hate to be the one to break it to you, but there's nothing on your cell now that can't be accessed by the provider or an agency with the tech.Solaris wrote:Within in 10 years, all cellphones will have a backdoor for GOVT access. Get your pre-ban while you can. I am amazed Apple has held out so long.
Re: California Wants to Ban Encrypted Smartphones
I hate to break it to you, but this had nothing to do with a encrypted cell phone.Taypo wrote:
Here's an example for you: The Couch kid was busted when mom ordered a pizza delivered. How do you think they got that info?