![Image](http://john-boy.net/images/mysteryduck/duck1.jpg)
![Image](http://john-boy.net/images/mysteryduck/duck2.jpg)
![Image](http://john-boy.net/images/mysteryduck/duck3.jpg)
![Image](http://john-boy.net/images/mysteryduck/duck4.jpg)
Any ideas?
Moderator: carlson1
Part of Christmas Dinner, I think. Depends on how well the recipes I have work.anygunanywhere wrote:Supper? Gumbo?
Anygunanywhere
Mrs. Anygun cooks a great duck. She does a brandied cherry sauce that complements the gamey duck really well. Duck is a great holiday dish. I was never one for waterfowl hunting except for early teal which we would use for a delicious duck gumbo. When she worked for a pediatrician when our boys were growing up, he was an avid waterfowler and would trade us ducks for my venison sausage.NcongruNt wrote:Part of Christmas Dinner, I think. Depends on how well the recipes I have work.anygunanywhere wrote:Supper? Gumbo?
Anygunanywhere
This species of duck makes up the majority of my birds, and from what I can find, they have good flavor.
Spoken like a true sportsman. Spent a lot of time in the marsh, have you brianko? It is nice to see that those that choose to hunt can count on your support for their second amendment rights.brianko wrote:Why would you shoot at a duck (or any animal) that you can't identify before you shoot it? Doesn't that sort of take the "sport" out of hunting?
I found your photos rather offensive. Of course, I'm probably the only one here with that opinion. But I felt it had to be said.
Followup: Just noticed this is actually in a topic called "Hunting Photos." Who would have imagined...and I thought this was a CHL board.
He identified it. It's a duck, probably shot during duck season. Now he just wants to know what kind of duck it is exactly.brianko wrote:Why would you shoot at a duck (or any animal) that you can't identify before you shoot it? Doesn't that sort of take the "sport" out of hunting?
I found your photos rather offensive. Of course, I'm probably the only one here with that opinion. But I felt it had to be said.
Followup: Just noticed this is actually in a topic called "Hunting Photos." Who would have imagined...and I thought this was a CHL board.
Nothing offensive about his post or photos, but your post is quite offensive. This is your last warning, knock it off or you're gone. Don't post a response, don't send me another PM, just quit now.brianko wrote:Why would you shoot at a duck (or any animal) that you can't identify before you shoot it? Doesn't that sort of take the "sport" out of hunting?
I found your photos rather offensive. Of course, I'm probably the only one here with that opinion. But I felt it had to be said.
Followup: Just noticed this is actually in a topic called "Hunting Photos." Who would have imagined...and I thought this was a CHL board.
Quite right. It's a duck. I shot it yesterday. It is duck season. There are only a few restrictions on specific species of duck. They are generally easy to identify, and these were not similar in appearance to any of the restricted species.flb_78 wrote:He identified it. It's a duck, probably shot during duck season. Now he just wants to know what kind of duck it is exactly.brianko wrote:Why would you shoot at a duck (or any animal) that you can't identify before you shoot it? Doesn't that sort of take the "sport" out of hunting?
I found your photos rather offensive. Of course, I'm probably the only one here with that opinion. But I felt it had to be said.
Followup: Just noticed this is actually in a topic called "Hunting Photos." Who would have imagined...and I thought this was a CHL board.
Unfortunately, I live in an apartment, and don't have proper space to deal with plucking ducks. I already breasted these ones out, so I can't make that this time around. The recipe sounds great, though. I'll be sure to use it in the future.LarryH wrote:My wife is tugging at my sleeve. She insists that I share with you HER duck recipe.
"Duck" is not the limit of legally required identification.flb_78 wrote:He identified it. It's a duck, probably shot during duck season.
There are several species listed with a one-duck limit, and if you don't know what you're shooting at, how can you be certain it's not a variant of one of those species?The daily bag limit shall be 5 ducks with the following species and sex restrictions - two scaup, two redhead, and two wood duck; only one from the following aggregate bag: one hen mallard, or one pintail, or one canvasback, or one "dusky duck" (mottled duck, Mexican-like duck, black duck, and their hybrids); all other ducks not listed - five.
As I stated above, I am aware of the restrictions. The ducks listed are rather distinctive and identified pretty easily (and some don't even come around these parts). This was my first duck hunt. I went with experienced friends. I made sure I knew the rules and restrictions before I went, and familiarized myself with the species of concern. I find it unreasonable to expect a person who is going hunting duck for the first time to be able to readily identify every single species of duck he comes across. I was aware of the restrictions and am familiar enough with those species to identify them and stay within the law.KD5NRH wrote:"Duck" is not the limit of legally required identification.flb_78 wrote:He identified it. It's a duck, probably shot during duck season.There are several species listed with a one-duck limit, and if you don't know what you're shooting at, how can you be certain it's not a variant of one of those species?The daily bag limit shall be 5 ducks with the following species and sex restrictions - two scaup, two redhead, and two wood duck; only one from the following aggregate bag: one hen mallard, or one pintail, or one canvasback, or one "dusky duck" (mottled duck, Mexican-like duck, black duck, and their hybrids); all other ducks not listed - five.
Do you really think the GW would let you off if you claimed to think that your sixth whitetail of the year was a pronghorn because you couldn't see it very well before you shot it?
How, exactly, is my post offensive? I mean, let's engage in some rational debate here...I posted a question, and I posted an opinion. Last time I checked, this forum was chock-full of opinions, so why ismy opinion any more offensive than any other opinion posted on this forum?Charles L. Cotton wrote: Nothing offensive about his post or photos, but your post is quite offensive. This is your last warning, knock it off or you're gone. Don't post a response, don't send me another PM, just quit now.