Condition One 24/7 OK for my gun?
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:33 pm
Points well taken.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
How do you cock and lock an XD? It has no hammerTheYoungGuy wrote:I carry a .40 S&W, 4" Springfield XD, and other than while I'm reloading clips at the range, it is always cocked and locked. Is this a bad thing?
Great thoughts, LJ. As for the above mentioned "safety issue", I assure you that issue is why I DON'T carry a Glock. I think they are unsafe. My XD, some would argue, is only differentiated by a grip safety similar to the traditional 1911, but that safety makes a world of difference, IMHO. I practice drawing with a firm, ready grip yet with a cautious trigger finger. I also make extra sure that I holster and/or re-holster with my thumb over the back of the slide to ensure that IF for some crazy reason my trigger were to "grab" onto something, my grip safety would not be engaged; thus preventing a ND.LedJedi wrote:3) it's more of a safety issue than a hardware issue. Make SURE you carry in such a way that your stuff will NOT go off with accidental trigger pull. That's one of the reasons I don't carry a glock like that. If something catches that trigger and you're loaded you're gonna shoot something. I intentionally found a gun that was comfortable to carry, shoot and had a thumb safety i was happy with.
100% agreeTheYoungGuy wrote:Great thoughts, LJ. As for the above mentioned "safety issue", I assure you that issue is why I DON'T carry a Glock. I think they are unsafe. My XD, some would argue, is only differentiated by a grip safety similar to the traditional 1911, but that safety makes a world of difference, IMHO. I practice drawing with a firm, ready grip yet with a cautious trigger finger. I also make extra sure that I holster and/or re-holster with my thumb over the back of the slide to ensure that IF for some crazy reason my trigger were to "grab" onto something, my grip safety would not be engaged; thus preventing a ND.LedJedi wrote:3) it's more of a safety issue than a hardware issue. Make SURE you carry in such a way that your stuff will NOT go off with accidental trigger pull. That's one of the reasons I don't carry a glock like that. If something catches that trigger and you're loaded you're gonna shoot something. I intentionally found a gun that was comfortable to carry, shoot and had a thumb safety i was happy with.
TheYoungGuy wrote:As for the above mentioned "safety issue", I assure you that issue is why I DON'T carry a Glock. I think they are unsafe.
not true AT ALL. It is disabled until AN OBJECT is on the trigger. Fingers are but one object that can fire the weapon. ;)razoraggie wrote:TheYoungGuy wrote:As for the above mentioned "safety issue", I assure you that issue is why I DON'T carry a Glock. I think they are unsafe.
?????
Glocks are unsafe?!?
One of the safest pistols on the market shows the research from Guns and Ammo Magazine. The internal mechanism is completely disabled until your finger is ON the trigger.
because with a Glock one must press the trigger to break it down for cleaning. (which is a serious flaw, IMO)razoraggieAnd B.T.W. wrote: Why would your finger be on the trigger anyways unless you had the intention of shooting it?
man... as much as you're rough around the edges... i have to love a guy who tells it like it is :)txinvestigator wrote:not true AT ALL. It is disabled until AN OBJECT is on the trigger. Fingers are but one object that can fire the weapon. ;)razoraggie wrote:TheYoungGuy wrote:As for the above mentioned "safety issue", I assure you that issue is why I DON'T carry a Glock. I think they are unsafe.
?????
Glocks are unsafe?!?
One of the safest pistols on the market shows the research from Guns and Ammo Magazine. The internal mechanism is completely disabled until your finger is ON the trigger.
It is an inanimate object, without being safe or unsafe on it own. ;)razoraggie wrote:So then you believe that they are unsafe, Txi?
Being around guns and people shooting guns as much as I have been, I have learned that people do dumb things with firearms, even well trained people, but guns don't act alone.Or that the safety of a firearm soley depends on the discipline and catiousness of the carrier? That was the point of my post.