Luggo1 wrote:Flew Lubbock to Dallas-Love round trip in April.
Zero hassles in either location, though now that it was mentioned above, I do believe the TSA guy in Lubbock wanted to see the gun, so I opened the locked case. No hassle though. This is indeed a violation of TSA's own rules?
The are some circumstances where a TSA screener may need to see in the case containing the firearm, such as if it obscures an area on the x-ray that may present a threat. I have had to open suitcases containing firearms because someone's travel alarm clock was positioned in such a way that their firearm made it difficult to determine whether the clock was connected to something else, which would be a threat. Such situations were always manually resolved when I was with TSA, but now they use something called OSARP, which is On Screen Assessment and Resolution Protocol.
We often used to take a bag where a firearm was obscuring something, and run it through a second time in a different position, usually resulting in a satisfactory resolution without having to open the bag.
Rarely, very rarely, once we were all trained properly, did we ever have to actually have the gun removed from its case, and in that circumstance we were required to call a LEO to handle the firearm. One time we had a shotgun in a case and the owner had a mini-cassette player, with headphones, in the case that he used to listen to talking books while in a deer stand (seems kind of dumb to me, I like to listen for my deer too, and whatever else might be going on nearby) and the cassette player, headphone cord, and some ammo (in the case with the gun but properly packed) lined up in such a way as to resembole an IED. One of our screeners got antsy, pretty much sure that he knew what the score was, and he would have been right, and got tired of waiting for a supervisor and a LEO to show up, so he took the shotgun out of the case to look. He got an instant three day vacation without pay.
The scenario presented by the poster above, where the screener gave him attitude about a bag that was zip-tied by the airline, and then handled his gun, is a prime example of a situation where the screener deserves to be disciplined. The screener did nothing to enhance the safety of the flight or passengers (if we have the whole story, not questioning that, just sayin') and violated several TSA rules, the worst of which was to handle a firearm.
TSA screeners, even those of us with impeccable firearms training credentials, are not allowed to handle firearms. I was qualified to teach NY State's Pistol Permit safety course to help qualify people to obtain a NY Pistol Permit, was a Gunnner's Mate in the Navy, and ship's armorer, and have a bunch of other firearms experience including several safety officer certifications, and I was never allowed, under any circumstances, to handle a firearm, even to check if it was loaded. I even used to take great delight in identifying various firearms' makes and models from their silhouettes during tests, suitably impressing others with this minor feat.
As a civilian I have had no compunctions about reporting my former co-workers for violations of the rules, including people who handled firearms, allowed knives through screening checkpoints, and other things I know they are not supposed to do. I even went so far as to report a couple while I still worked for TSA and was traveling on personal business.
Just because they enforce the rules doesn't mean they get to violate them.
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes" Juvenal 1st century AD.
And a famous satire by Zero Mostel during the red scare in the late 1940s.