NcongruNt wrote:Then there's the point that a disgruntled postal employee intent on killing people is not likely to be swayed by a federal regulation saying he can't have his gun there. But we must make sure people can't defend themselves on federal property! Perhaps the $50 fine will deter him!ScubaSigGuy wrote:
Not intending to be insenstiive or offend anyone but, It would seem that this rule is to protect the emplyees from other disgruntled employees.
Makes perfect sense to me!
Exactly.
So many of the places that we can't carry don't make sense.