jbarn wrote:
Regardless of what they are called, if their role consist of any of the following licensing is required;
(1) prevent entry, larceny, vandalism, abuse, fire, or
trespass on private property;
(2) prevent, observe, or detect unauthorized activity
on private property;
(3) control, regulate, or direct the movement of the
public, whether by vehicle or otherwise, only to the extent and for
the time directly and specifically required to ensure the
protection of property;
(4) protect an individual from bodily harm including
through the use of a personal protection officer; or
(5) perform a function similar to a function listed in
this section.
If this is something that anyone in Texas ever contemplates enforcing, then, as my NYPD friends say, it needs to be repealed FORTHWITH. During the gasoline shortage of days past, I openly carried a 1911 and 4 extra mags to prevent all kinds of mischief on company property I was charged with managing. DPD had no problems with it - and we had to call them frequently.
I would expect anyone trying to enforce this on a church might encounter rather more resistance than they anticipate. Makes me want to legislatively slap more restrictions on private security firms.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44c0d/44c0dfa59c9ce4ca3faaa4029765db8b091ee23b" alt="mad5 :mad5"