College premises, Tennis tournament

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#16

Post by Keith B »

jbarn wrote:
srothstein wrote:I am going to disagree with some of the previous posters, sort of. I agree with the way Redneck91 reads the law. The law says you are prohibited from carrying in the premises of a sporting event. The premises means buildings, as this is the section with the specific definition that says so.

The problem I do want to caution you that there are many who will interpret the definition of premises differently than I do. When you go to the tennis courts, most are not indoors in a building. Most are contained inside a fenced area and have bleachers along the sides for spectators. But, to maintain the comparison, I will switch over and ask if a football stadium is a building or not. It has walls but no roof (well most college level anyway) and is a field part of the building? If it only has one floor and the walls are just to help keep people paying for admission, like a fence, is it still a building?

So, I recommend not carrying at the event. This is because I also recommend not being the test case to clarify the law. And until we get some court rulings, we don't know exactly what the law will consider a building. Clarifying the law can be an expensive hobby to partake in.

Unlawful to carry on the grounds of a school sponsored event. ;-)

Discussion about premises or professional, college or High School sporting events are really don't apply here. Fun to ponder, yes.

And to that, premises is defined, and not open to different defintions, right?
Past experience has shown that if a legal definition is not specifically listed in a chapter they will sometimes reference other penal codes to get a consensus of the meaning and use that to apply to the offense.

Building is defined in TPC 30.01 and 28.01. The best definition is 30.01 which says:
"Building" means any enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade,
manufacture, ornament, or use.
So when you go to the definition of enclose(d) it says:
en·close [en-klohz]
verb (used with object), en·closed, en·clos·ing.
1.to shut or hem in; close in on all sides: a valley enclosed by tall mountains.
2. to surround, as with a fence or wall: to enclose land.
.........


And for structure it is:
struc·ture [struhk-cher]
noun
1.mode of building, construction, or organization; arrangement of parts, elements, or constituents: a pyramidal structure.
2.something built or constructed, as a building, bridge, or dam.
3.a complex system considered from the point of view of the whole rather than of any single part: the structure of modern science.
4.anything composed of parts arranged together in some way; an organization.
5.the relationship or organization of the component parts of a work of art or literature: the structure of a poem.
So, looking at the definitions, I would say a tennis court or football stadium is an enclosed structure if surrounded by walls or fences, and hence it would also be considered a building/premise.

So, event or not, it would be off limits. The sporting event will also on school grounds will also be off limits, so in this case two strikes mean you are out.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

jbarn
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:50 am
Location: South Texas

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#17

Post by jbarn »

Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:
srothstein wrote:I am going to disagree with some of the previous posters, sort of. I agree with the way Redneck91 reads the law. The law says you are prohibited from carrying in the premises of a sporting event. The premises means buildings, as this is the section with the specific definition that says so.

The problem I do want to caution you that there are many who will interpret the definition of premises differently than I do. When you go to the tennis courts, most are not indoors in a building. Most are contained inside a fenced area and have bleachers along the sides for spectators. But, to maintain the comparison, I will switch over and ask if a football stadium is a building or not. It has walls but no roof (well most college level anyway) and is a field part of the building? If it only has one floor and the walls are just to help keep people paying for admission, like a fence, is it still a building?

So, I recommend not carrying at the event. This is because I also recommend not being the test case to clarify the law. And until we get some court rulings, we don't know exactly what the law will consider a building. Clarifying the law can be an expensive hobby to partake in.

Unlawful to carry on the grounds of a school sponsored event. ;-)

Discussion about premises or professional, college or High School sporting events are really don't apply here. Fun to ponder, yes.

And to that, premises is defined, and not open to different defintions, right?
Past experience has shown that if a legal definition is not specifically listed in a chapter they will sometimes reference other penal codes to get a consensus of the meaning and use that to apply to the offense.

Building is defined in TPC 30.01 and 28.01. The best definition is 30.01 which says:
"Building" means any enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade,
manufacture, ornament, or use.
So when you go to the definition of enclose(d) it says:
en·close [en-klohz]
verb (used with object), en·closed, en·clos·ing.
1.to shut or hem in; close in on all sides: a valley enclosed by tall mountains.
2. to surround, as with a fence or wall: to enclose land.
.........


And for structure it is:
struc·ture [struhk-cher]
noun
1.mode of building, construction, or organization; arrangement of parts, elements, or constituents: a pyramidal structure.
2.something built or constructed, as a building, bridge, or dam.
3.a complex system considered from the point of view of the whole rather than of any single part: the structure of modern science.
4.anything composed of parts arranged together in some way; an organization.
5.the relationship or organization of the component parts of a work of art or literature: the structure of a poem.
So, looking at the definitions, I would say a tennis court or football stadium is an enclosed structure if surrounded by walls or fences, and hence it would also be considered a building/premise.

So, event or not, it would be off limits. The sporting event will also on school grounds will also be off limits, so in this case two strikes mean you are out.
While I don't buy that a fence around a tennis court makes it a building, for argument's sake I will use your definition...... Even by the loose definition unless one was INSIDE the fenced area he would not be under 46.035.

But a fenced yard aint a building.
Texas CHL Instructor
Texas DPS Certified Private Security Classroom and Firearms Instructor
TCLEOSE Instructor (now TCOLE)

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#18

Post by MeMelYup »

It encloses the property as long as it has a gate and it is closed.
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#19

Post by Keith B »

jbarn wrote:While I don't buy that a fence around a tennis court makes it a building, for argument's sake I will use your definition...... Even by the loose definition unless one was INSIDE the fenced area he would not be under 46.035.

But a fenced yard aint a building.
If I was a DA and prosecuting someone for this, it would be my case evidence. The Judge or Jury can rule on if it is or isn't.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

jbarn
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:50 am
Location: South Texas

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#20

Post by jbarn »

Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:While I don't buy that a fence around a tennis court makes it a building, for argument's sake I will use your definition...... Even by the loose definition unless one was INSIDE the fenced area he would not be under 46.035.

But a fenced yard aint a building.
If I was a DA and prosecuting someone for this, it would be my case evidence. The Judge or Jury can rule on if it is or isn't.

My fenced backyard is now a building?
Texas CHL Instructor
Texas DPS Certified Private Security Classroom and Firearms Instructor
TCLEOSE Instructor (now TCOLE)
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#21

Post by Keith B »

jbarn wrote:
Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:While I don't buy that a fence around a tennis court makes it a building, for argument's sake I will use your definition...... Even by the loose definition unless one was INSIDE the fenced area he would not be under 46.035.

But a fenced yard aint a building.
If I was a DA and prosecuting someone for this, it would be my case evidence. The Judge or Jury can rule on if it is or isn't.

My fenced backyard is now a building?
Ddin't say that. Is your backyard an 'enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use'? Probably not. But a tennis court is a structure and if enclosed by the fence, then it i would meet the criteria. Same with a football stadium, etc.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

jbarn
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:50 am
Location: South Texas

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#22

Post by jbarn »

Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:
Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:While I don't buy that a fence around a tennis court makes it a building, for argument's sake I will use your definition...... Even by the loose definition unless one was INSIDE the fenced area he would not be under 46.035.

But a fenced yard aint a building.
If I was a DA and prosecuting someone for this, it would be my case evidence. The Judge or Jury can rule on if it is or isn't.

My fenced backyard is now a building?
Ddin't say that. Is your backyard an 'enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use'? Probably not. But a tennis court is a structure and if enclosed by the fence, then it i would meet the criteria. Same with a football stadium, etc.

Yes, it is a enclosed structure intended for some purpose of use. So it is a building? :reddevil
Texas CHL Instructor
Texas DPS Certified Private Security Classroom and Firearms Instructor
TCLEOSE Instructor (now TCOLE)
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#23

Post by Keith B »

jbarn wrote:
Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:
Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:While I don't buy that a fence around a tennis court makes it a building, for argument's sake I will use your definition...... Even by the loose definition unless one was INSIDE the fenced area he would not be under 46.035.

But a fenced yard aint a building.
If I was a DA and prosecuting someone for this, it would be my case evidence. The Judge or Jury can rule on if it is or isn't.

My fenced backyard is now a building?
Ddin't say that. Is your backyard an 'enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use'? Probably not. But a tennis court is a structure and if enclosed by the fence, then it i would meet the criteria. Same with a football stadium, etc.

Yes, it is a enclosed structure intended for some purpose of use. So it is a building? :reddevil
What is the structure? Do you have a ppol ot tennis court? If just yard, then it is not a structure.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

jbarn
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:50 am
Location: South Texas

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#24

Post by jbarn »

Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:
Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:
Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote:While I don't buy that a fence around a tennis court makes it a building, for argument's sake I will use your definition...... Even by the loose definition unless one was INSIDE the fenced area he would not be under 46.035.

But a fenced yard aint a building.
If I was a DA and prosecuting someone for this, it would be my case evidence. The Judge or Jury can rule on if it is or isn't.

My fenced backyard is now a building?
Ddin't say that. Is your backyard an 'enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade, manufacture, ornament, or use'? Probably not. But a tennis court is a structure and if enclosed by the fence, then it i would meet the criteria. Same with a football stadium, etc.

Yes, it is a enclosed structure intended for some purpose of use. So it is a building? :reddevil
What is the structure? Do you have a ppol ot tennis court? If just yard, then it is not a structure.
The "structure" is the fence. Isn't that what you say makes the tennis court a structure? But I DO have a patio cover a deck and an island grilling station.

What is the difference? :confused5
Texas CHL Instructor
Texas DPS Certified Private Security Classroom and Firearms Instructor
TCLEOSE Instructor (now TCOLE)
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#25

Post by Keith B »

jbarn wrote: The "structure" is the fence. Isn't that what you say makes the tennis court a structure? But I DO have a patio cover a deck and an island grilling station.

What is the difference? :confused5
No, the fence 'encloses' the 'structure'. The tennis court is the structure. A football field, bleachers, concession stand are structures. The patio cover, deck and island grilling stations would be structures in your yard.

Again, I am pushing this definition to the full limit. It may well not be ruled as i am stating, but a crafty DA who wants to push the limits and make an example could very well decide they will take their chances with the definitions and let the judge and/or jury decide if they made a good enough case to say it met the criteria.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9582
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#26

Post by RoyGBiv »

Keith B wrote:
jbarn wrote: The "structure" is the fence. Isn't that what you say makes the tennis court a structure? But I DO have a patio cover a deck and an island grilling station.

What is the difference? :confused5
No, the fence 'encloses' the 'structure'. The tennis court is the structure. A football field, bleachers, concession stand are structures. The patio cover, deck and island grilling stations would be structures in your yard.

Again, I am pushing this definition to the full limit. It may well not be ruled as i am stating, but a crafty DA who wants to push the limits and make an example could very well decide they will take their chances with the definitions and let the judge and/or jury decide if they made a good enough case to say it met the criteria.
I see your point, but believe it's stretched too far...
"Building" means any enclosed structure intended for use or occupation as a habitation or for some purpose of trade,
manufacture, ornament, or use.
Seems to me that a fenced tennis court (or an open football field or a basketball court with bleachers) is well outside the bolded part of the description. Re: Athletic facilities, my own personal line in the sand is based on whether they can "lock me out". If, when the facility is "closed", it can be secured in such a way that I have to open a door, unlock a gate (my local public school has a fenced track that cannot be locked, I don't consider that off limits for CC when school is not in session, but if they modified it so that it could be locked, i would stay out.), climb a fence, etc... then I won't CC there at any time. I still don't consider it a "structure" in the sense of 46.03/.035, but it's gray enough for me to be wary of overzealous prosecution.

I do agree 100% that I'd prefer not to be a test case. :mrgreen:
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

Greybeard
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2412
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Denton County
Contact:

Re: College premises, Tennis tournament

#27

Post by Greybeard »

"I also sleep on the couch a lot so what do I know"

Hey, it sorta like camping. ;-) And much more comfortable than a tent and a cot. Or the dog house.
CHL Instructor since 1995
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”