City Buildings and 30.06

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

tbrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1685
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 4:47 pm

Re: City Buildings and 30.06

#16

Post by tbrown »

RottenApple wrote:
Texas Sheepdog wrote:
Dirthawking wrote:Now I have heard people say that Government buildings can not be posted 30.06. I am looking for the where and why?
It's legal for government buildings to post a 30.06 sign. There was a bill to limit that but Senator Carona got it derailed.
Just because its legal, doesn't make it valid. It's perfectly legal for a city-owned library (with no court offices r other disqualifying factors) to post a 30.06 sign. It's also just as legal for a CHL holder to ignore it and carry away.
That's true but thanks to some selfish Senators, the municipal building can continue to post that 30.06 sign 24x7 with impunity. We know the sign is only valid when there's a government meeting in progress, but woe be to us if we get their schedule wrong.
sent to you from my safe space in the hill country

JP171
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: City Buildings and 30.06

#17

Post by JP171 »

tbrown wrote:
RottenApple wrote:
Texas Sheepdog wrote:
Dirthawking wrote:Now I have heard people say that Government buildings can not be posted 30.06. I am looking for the where and why?
It's legal for government buildings to post a 30.06 sign. There was a bill to limit that but Senator Carona got it derailed.
Just because its legal, doesn't make it valid. It's perfectly legal for a city-owned library (with no court offices r other disqualifying factors) to post a 30.06 sign. It's also just as legal for a CHL holder to ignore it and carry away.
That's true but thanks to some selfish Senators, the municipal building can continue to post that 30.06 sign 24x7 with impunity. We know the sign is only valid when there's a government meeting in progress, but woe be to us if we get their schedule wrong.

The meeting portion only applies to the room where the meeting is held not the entire building

cb1000rider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm

Re: City Buildings and 30.06

#18

Post by cb1000rider »

Where does the law specify that?
User avatar

SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: Alvin
Contact:

Re: City Buildings and 30.06

#19

Post by SewTexas »

doesn't it also only apply for this particular building when court is in session? so he should be able to carry when he's paying his water bill.
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 18502
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: City Buildings and 30.06

#20

Post by Keith B »

SewTexas wrote:doesn't it also only apply for this particular building when court is in session? so he should be able to carry when he's paying his water bill.
The statute says they can post a meeting of a government entity, but does not specify where the sign should be, so kind of a gray area.

On courts, if a court or office of the court is in the building at all, then if it is not cordoned off from the rest of the area where it is segmented, then you can't go into the portion of the building period, posted or not, as it is always off limits whether in session or out.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”