texanjoker wrote:Good article discussing the pros and cons for a off duty leo. In reality take away the job aspect and it's a good article for any chl holder as well. The second article backs up the first and the bullet points are a must read for everybody in here.
Carrying a weapon off duty has been a lively topic of discussion for decades. As with most issues, being armed 24/7 has its pros and cons. However, if we look at this topic objectively, particularly, from a standpoint of risk and reward, I think most of us can agree that a police officer should carry their weapon while off duty.
http://www.officer.com/article/11221281 ... -yes-or-no
http://www.officer.com/article/10455697/off-duty-cop
Both are excellent and thoughtful articles. Thanks very much for sharing them.
The basic thought process most certainly applies to CHL carry as well.
I had my first insight into the pluses and minuses of off duty carry when, at the end of my first shift on the day I was sworn in, I left my just purchased off duty gun in my apartment and walked into my local Bronx, New York deli a couple of minutes after the 3 man holdup team had left. The folks in the store were still shaking. In those days, if the BG's found a police shield on you when they got your wallet, you were dead meat. I was carrying my shield.
Hmmm.
I might not be the quickest guy around, but I'm not the slowest either. That was the last time I left the house unarmed unless I was going to the airport.
Even back then the mousegun concept didn't look like a good idea to me. My off duty carry guns were .357 magnum, 9mm and .45, although for a BUG I sometimes settled for a .38.