matchstick wrote: And my instructor (Mike at the Bullet Trap, he was great BTW), was pretty clear in stating that the "limit" is up to the LEO in question. If that LEO thinks you're impaired, then regardless of your Blood Alcohol Content, you're in violation. At least that is how it was taught to me.
Baloney. LEO's are not judges or juries. If an LEO "thinks you're impaired", he may well
accuse you of being impaired, but he still has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you are
legally intoxicated.
He can think you're impaired all he wants. But he can also be mistaken, dishonest, or just plain wrong. That's why we have trials, courts, juries, etc.
matchstick wrote: And he definitely made us understand that you can drink, but legally there is no clearly defined limit. So if you really want to be safe, don't carry when you drink. But he never said that you'd be definitely breaking the law if you did.
1) If you never drink, it would take a very dishonest cop to hang a carrying while intoxicated charge on you. And you would have to help him out by having a lousy lawyer or none at all.
2) If you drink moderately (i.e. one drink), a dishonest or dull-witted crusader type cop may still try to hang a carrying while intoxicated charge on you - probably just before he goes off duty and gets hammered with a bunch of guys on his shift. But you would still need to help him out a lot with poor legal representation.
3) If you drink a sixpack or half a bottle of Jack,
any cop will be able to nail you for carrying while intoxicated, because the overwhelming likelihood is that you would really
be intoxicated - and shouldn't be carrying or driving.
matchstick wrote: For the record, I find the entire topic irrelevant since I don't drink. Now where's my congratulations? ;)
Congratulations. Now be sure to lay off red meat and eggs and eat a lot of oatmeal, tofu and veggies. You want to be sure your wine-starved arteries don't get all clogged up.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)