Minor incident with another CHL'er today

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


texanjoker

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#16

Post by texanjoker »

mojo84 wrote:I don't think the op said anything about what his chl instructor taught him and I didn't see where the trooper said he could carry in the post office.

If someone with a chl has to stare at someone's gun and a trooper said it was ok, maybe the ordinary person wouldn't notice it. Kind of like the clips on my crossbreed holster.
:iagree: this could have.been ugly. I don't contact people unless at work because.people do not like confrontation, and if the person contacted didn't have a.cool head this could have.been ugly...maybe the person contacted is a poster and we can hear their side of the story. Personally I would tell anybody that contacted me to mind their own business and not answer their questions.

The good part of this is that the poster kept his boss from making it a no carry zone.
User avatar

nyj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 897
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:30 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#17

Post by nyj »

mojo84 wrote:I don't think the op said anything about what his chl instructor taught him and I didn't see where the trooper said he could carry in the post office.

If someone with a chl has to stare at someone's gun and a trooper said it was ok, maybe the ordinary person wouldn't notice it. Kind of like the clips on my crossbreed holster.
You carry clips?
User avatar

MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#18

Post by MasterOfNone »

nyj wrote:
mojo84 wrote:I don't think the op said anything about what his chl instructor taught him and I didn't see where the trooper said he could carry in the post office.

If someone with a chl has to stare at someone's gun and a trooper said it was ok, maybe the ordinary person wouldn't notice it. Kind of like the clips on my crossbreed holster.
You carry clips?
Of course. They are what holds the holster to the belt.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9045
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#19

Post by mojo84 »

MasterOfNone wrote:
nyj wrote:
mojo84 wrote:I don't think the op said anything about what his chl instructor taught him and I didn't see where the trooper said he could carry in the post office.

If someone with a chl has to stare at someone's gun and a trooper said it was ok, maybe the ordinary person wouldn't notice it. Kind of like the clips on my crossbreed holster.
You carry clips?
Of course. They are what holds the holster to the belt.
What he said. My holster has two clips that hold my gun with a fully loaded MAGAZINE.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

RCP
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 130
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:30 pm

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#20

Post by RCP »

tentex wrote:My opinion as to the question of who was his CHL instructor was is that he was trying to get the holder to give a name, if he was slow to give one then maybe he was not legal. If he gave a name then you could possibly engage him in idle talk and educate him a little. There are somepeople that you will never convince to carry the proper way and will ruin it for the ones that want to do it the right way.
I've had my CHL for years, been through 3 renewals, I couldn't tell you the name of any of my class instructors. :headscratch

Ericstac
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:21 am
Location: Fort Bend Co.

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#21

Post by Ericstac »

RCP wrote:
tentex wrote:My opinion as to the question of who was his CHL instructor was is that he was trying to get the holder to give a name, if he was slow to give one then maybe he was not legal. If he gave a name then you could possibly engage him in idle talk and educate him a little. There are somepeople that you will never convince to carry the proper way and will ruin it for the ones that want to do it the right way.
I've had my CHL for years, been through 3 renewals, I couldn't tell you the name of any of my class instructors. :headscratch

Lol. The whole thread I've been trying to think of my instructors, 3 or 4 of them, can't remember.. Heck, I can't remember if they were black white male or female..lol.. But I don't carry in a post office.

Maybe the dude was a newbie and just rattled off places, like post office, trying to sound like he was secure in his carry but in reality he has not carried once and that was to walmart for his Wally walk...
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#22

Post by jmra »

I'm sure we will read about the guy in the news one day. Probably when he wears that getup to a Cowboys game. He can do that, his instructor said so. "rlol"
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 26870
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#23

Post by The Annoyed Man »

If you break the OP up into it's component parts, it's real easy to understand. Here is a dissection of what was actually said/done, item by item. If it isn't here, it wasn't said or didn't happen......

Item #1, 2farnorth sees a customer with his 2nd Amendment showing:
2farnorth wrote:A gentleman walks in the store today and I notice the square black case on his right side. His shirt was fully tucked in. As he walks away it's very clear that it is a gun butt openly visible from the rear.
Item #2, coworker notices 2farnorth's alerting on customer:
2farnorth wrote:A co-worker see's me looking and notices it also.
Item #3, co-worker notifies manager, who is nervous:
2farnorth wrote:He immediately went and told the owner's daughter who manages the store. She get's very nervous and wants to call the police.
Item #4, 2farnorth says, "let me handle it first:"
2farnorth wrote:I asked her to let me approach the man and work it. I approached him on a side aisle and ask him if he was a peace officer. He said "no sir".
Item #5, 2farnorth notifies customer that OC is illegal in Texas:
2farnorth wrote:I said you do know that open carry is unlawful in this state.
Item #6, and this is where the confusion over who said what starts, customer says a "state trooper" (we don't know if it is specifically a Texas DPS trooper) has said method of carry is legal. Please note, we don't know if said trooper has actually seen the customer carrying the gun this way, particularly from behind. For all we know, the customer either told the trooper about an ad he saw for the product, or showed an empty case to a trooper and asked him if this would be a legal means of carry, and the trooper assumed that this dim bulb intended to carry a gun which actually fits properly in this case:
2farnorth wrote: He said he has a chl and that a state trooper said his method of carry was okay and that there was no 3006 on the door. :bigmouth
Item #7, 2farnorth advises customer that his gun is exposed and clearly identifiable:
2farnorth wrote: I advised him that from the rear the gun butt was readily visible and easily identifiable as a gun.
Item #8, CUSTOMER PUBLICLY DRAWS HIS GUN!!!:
2farnorth wrote:He then pulled it out and placed it in his back pocket. :shock:
Item #9, customer states that he has been carrying into post offices as if either A) he didn't know it was illegal; or B) he thought it was OK to break the law if he was deeply concealed enough:
2farnorth wrote:Also stated that he had been carrying it in post offices and many other places and no one had noticed before :eek6 .
Item #10, 2farnorth wisely follows up about instructor:
2farnorth wrote:I made idle chit chat with him as I checked him out and asked the name of his CHL instructor.
Item #11, 2farnorth deals with manager and the impact this may or may not have on his own future carry options at work:
2farnorth wrote:After he left I was able to talk the owners out of putting up the 3006 sign but she said it made her nervous to be around someone with a gun. She also wanted know why I knew so much about the CHL requirements. I told her that my past in doing security/body guard work required it. She also asked if I would tell her if I was carrying. I said don't ask the question unless you really want to know. She then said that if anyone was carrying that she would prefer it to be me. All in all it didn't do us CHlers any favors and raised an issue in my work place that didn't need to be raised. I may still get official 3006 notice in the near future. :waiting:
First of all, I'm surprised that nobody here except 2farnorth seems to care that the guy drew his gun.....in public. The proper thing to do would have been for the customer to assure 2farnorth that he would make sure to get it all sorted out when he gets out to his car, and then leave the store then and there.......but pulling the gun out is just plain bad juju and dumber than a bag of hammers!!! I think that 2farnorth did about as well as he could have, given the circumstances.

I would have sought out the instructor's name too. I can't think of an instructor on this board who, once it had been reported to him/her that one of their students was doing this, would not incorporate this story into their instruction as a lesson to the class of several violations of the law:
  1. "Printing" is not the same thing as "partially exposed." If you gun is exposed enough to be identifiable as a gun, and you are aware of this, then YOU ARE INTENTIONALLY FAILING TO CONCEAL, and you are in violation of state law (give the TPC code numbers).
  2. You may NEVER, under any circumstances, carry your weapon into a post office. If you do, you are in violation of federal law, and Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano are likely to take a dim view of it......and life will suddenly get much harder for you if you are caught. THIS federal government will be merciless in prosecuting you.
  3. Do not EVER draw your gun in public EXCEPT in self defense!!!!
  4. If you ignore this advice and get caught, you're on your own. DO NOT TELL THEM I WAS YOUR INSTRUCTOR!!!! I'm trying to run a business here, and I don't need that kind of PR.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

texanjoker

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#24

Post by texanjoker »

The Annoyed Man wrote:If you break the OP up into it's component parts, it's real easy to understand. Here is a dissection of what was actually said/done, item by item. If it isn't here, it wasn't said or didn't happen......

Item #1, 2farnorth sees a customer with his 2nd Amendment showing:
2farnorth wrote:A gentleman walks in the store today and I notice the square black case on his right side. His shirt was fully tucked in. As he walks away it's very clear that it is a gun butt openly visible from the rear.
Item #2, coworker notices 2farnorth's alerting on customer:
2farnorth wrote:A co-worker see's me looking and notices it also.
Item #3, co-worker notifies manager, who is nervous:
2farnorth wrote:He immediately went and told the owner's daughter who manages the store. She get's very nervous and wants to call the police.
Item #4, 2farnorth says, "let me handle it first:"
2farnorth wrote:I asked her to let me approach the man and work it. I approached him on a side aisle and ask him if he was a peace officer. He said "no sir".
Item #5, 2farnorth notifies customer that OC is illegal in Texas:
2farnorth wrote:I said you do know that open carry is unlawful in this state.
Item #6, and this is where the confusion over who said what starts, customer says a "state trooper" (we don't know if it is specifically a Texas DPS trooper) has said method of carry is legal. Please note, we don't know if said trooper has actually seen the customer carrying the gun this way, particularly from behind. For all we know, the customer either told the trooper about an ad he saw for the product, or showed an empty case to a trooper and asked him if this would be a legal means of carry, and the trooper assumed that this dim bulb intended to carry a gun which actually fits properly in this case:
2farnorth wrote: He said he has a chl and that a state trooper said his method of carry was okay and that there was no 3006 on the door. :bigmouth
Item #7, 2farnorth advises customer that his gun is exposed and clearly identifiable:
2farnorth wrote: I advised him that from the rear the gun butt was readily visible and easily identifiable as a gun.
Item #8, CUSTOMER PUBLICLY DRAWS HIS GUN!!!:
2farnorth wrote:He then pulled it out and placed it in his back pocket. :shock:
Item #9, customer states that he has been carrying into post offices as if either A) he didn't know it was illegal; or B) he thought it was OK to break the law if he was deeply concealed enough:
2farnorth wrote:Also stated that he had been carrying it in post offices and many other places and no one had noticed before :eek6 .
Item #10, 2farnorth wisely follows up about instructor:
2farnorth wrote:I made idle chit chat with him as I checked him out and asked the name of his CHL instructor.
Item #11, 2farnorth deals with manager and the impact this may or may not have on his own future carry options at work:
2farnorth wrote:After he left I was able to talk the owners out of putting up the 3006 sign but she said it made her nervous to be around someone with a gun. She also wanted know why I knew so much about the CHL requirements. I told her that my past in doing security/body guard work required it. She also asked if I would tell her if I was carrying. I said don't ask the question unless you really want to know. She then said that if anyone was carrying that she would prefer it to be me. All in all it didn't do us CHlers any favors and raised an issue in my work place that didn't need to be raised. I may still get official 3006 notice in the near future. :waiting:
First of all, I'm surprised that nobody here except 2farnorth seems to care that the guy drew his gun.....in public. The proper thing to do would have been for the customer to assure 2farnorth that he would make sure to get it all sorted out when he gets out to his car, and then leave the store then and there.......but pulling the gun out is just plain bad juju and dumber than a bag of hammers!!! I think that 2farnorth did about as well as he could have, given the circumstances.

I would have sought out the instructor's name too. I can't think of an instructor on this board who, once it had been reported to him/her that one of their students was doing this, would not incorporate this story into their instruction as a lesson to the class of several violations of the law:
  1. "Printing" is not the same thing as "partially exposed." If you gun is exposed enough to be identifiable as a gun, and you are aware of this, then YOU ARE INTENTIONALLY FAILING TO CONCEAL, and you are in violation of state law (give the TPC code numbers).
  2. You may NEVER, under any circumstances, carry your weapon into a post office. If you do, you are in violation of federal law, and Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano are likely to take a dim view of it......and life will suddenly get much harder for you if you are caught. THIS federal government will be merciless in prosecuting you.
  3. Do not EVER draw your gun in public EXCEPT in self defense!!!!
  4. If you ignore this advice and get caught, you're on your own. DO NOT TELL THEM I WAS YOUR INSTRUCTOR!!!! I'm trying to run a business here, and I don't need that kind of PR.

Everybody wanted to comment on my post about why he wanted to know the instructors name. IMO this has no bearing in this incident as the instructor was not there and is not responsible for this persons actions and that was why I asked the OP why he asked that. If there is an issue call 911 and let the police do their job. If they feel there is a CHL violation they can report it to DPS or potentially arrest the person if they are carrying without a CHL. The person carrying the gun was not obligated to answer any questions or even stand by and talk to the OP. He did and they worked it out with a peaceful resolution which shows our OP has good people skills. The guy with the gun reacted to being confronted and was probably embarrassed by it. Since the OP already knew he had a gun it would not be out of the norm for the guy to then adjust his carry method to show this OP that he was fixing the issue. Maybe not smart, but he was confronted on this and reacted. That is real life and one must expect the unexpected when making contacting somebody for a potential violation. Sometimes people, including LEO's have to think before contacting somebody because once you do, you may start the ball rolling in a direction you do not want.

We all see people all the time walking around "printing," which is a term only this forum talks about. If a gun is plainly visible under a shirt by outline, the buldge, shape, ect it is not properly concealed and may result in a contact. While it may not be illegal, it is poor judgement to carry in that manner and could be problematic for the person carrying the weapon.

As far as the post office, I would bet many carry their weapons in the post office and other off limit areas. That has no bearing on this incident aside from a guy saying he allegedly does that.

As I keep saying the best part of this story is the fact the OP convinced his boss to keep the business a legal place to carry :thumbs2:
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#25

Post by VMI77 »

tentex wrote:My opinion as to the question of who was his CHL instructor was is that he was trying to get the holder to give a name, if he was slow to give one then maybe he was not legal. If he gave a name then you could possibly engage him in idle talk and educate him a little. There are somepeople that you will never convince to carry the proper way and will ruin it for the ones that want to do it the right way.

Really, I don't remember my instructor's name....I'd have to look it up in my records. And outside of a local instructor I do know because I've taken advanced classes with him, any name he gave me would be meaningless.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com

jayinsat
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 756
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#26

Post by jayinsat »

RCP wrote:
tentex wrote:My opinion as to the question of who was his CHL instructor was is that he was trying to get the holder to give a name, if he was slow to give one then maybe he was not legal. If he gave a name then you could possibly engage him in idle talk and educate him a little. There are somepeople that you will never convince to carry the proper way and will ruin it for the ones that want to do it the right way.
I've had my CHL for years, been through 3 renewals, I couldn't tell you the name of any of my class instructors. :headscratch
It's the opposite for me. I'll never forget my instructors names. Chris and Chuck over at Tactical Safety Institute http://tac-safe.com were so good that i've referred dozens of clients to them. No one has come away with a less-than stellar experience. They are unforgettable individuals.
Armed not dangerous but potentially lethal.
CHL Application mailed 10/2/12
Plastic in hand 11/16/12
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#27

Post by JALLEN »

jayinsat wrote: It's the opposite for me. I'll never forget my instructors names. Chris and Chuck over at Tactical Safety Institute http://tac-safe.com were so good that i've referred dozens of clients to them. No one has come away with a less-than stellar experience. They are unforgettable individuals.
I'm glad you could remember that. I took their course ~ten days ago and couldn't have called their names for anything.

Of course, I'm old and may be entering the early stages of Whatzizname's Disease.
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

texanjoker

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#28

Post by texanjoker »

JALLEN wrote:
jayinsat wrote: It's the opposite for me. I'll never forget my instructors names. Chris and Chuck over at Tactical Safety Institute http://tac-safe.com were so good that i've referred dozens of clients to them. No one has come away with a less-than stellar experience. They are unforgettable individuals.
I'm glad you could remember that. I took their course ~ten days ago and couldn't have called their names for anything.

Of course, I'm old and may be entering the early stages of Whatzizname's Disease.
"rlol" :thumbs2:

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#29

Post by Abraham »

From what I've read the man realizes his gun butt is visible and perhaps, with it's visibility, likes giving off the impression that he's one tough/dangerous hombre, or maybe he likes being potentially regarded as an LEO or is simply just hard headed (read obtuse) as his reaction to being advised of his un-concealment is dreadfully inappropriate. He should've reacted with chagrin, not argumentation and a public display of his handgun. What a bone head.

His instructor is in no way responsible.

If he persists that he can carry unconcealed he should have his CHL revoked.

Pronto!

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 8406
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Minor incident with another CHL'er today

#30

Post by Abraham »

I neglected to mention: The bonehead should have been immensely grateful to be notified of his lack of concealment status.

I would bet any of us on this forum would be very appreciative of the discreet and kind notification - so much so we'd be thanking the man for taking the time, effort and shaking his hand.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”