data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18016/18016154d921a13e352fadb74db658c201a87d4e" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c56a/2c56a767423ea9c1bf7e136bfdf318ac01c684c6" alt="thumbs2 :thumbs2:"
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
+1Crossfire wrote:Target PAYS people to serve as security for Target's assets.
I am NOT one of those people.
Nuff said.
+2speedsix wrote:...if the loss prevention employee couldn't handle someone for lack of training...the sooner she finds it out, the sooner she finds her true calling...which ISN'T loss prevention...
tallmike wrote:
Even if the situation made me feel compelled to get involved, I would NOT have helped to hold the guy there until cops arrived. Once I got him to stop harming the security guard I would have backed off and let him run - if that was what he chose to do.
That sounds like a pretty good plan.ralewis wrote:
What I got out of this thread though (I hope) was a bit more pre-planning for a scenario I hadn't considered before. Maybe rather than reacting, I'd take a step back and be a good witness. If the situation turned into an assault with a deadly weapon, perhaps then that would be the time to get involved. Tough to know for sure though until a situation unfolds in front of me.