![Image](http://i1143.photobucket.com/albums/n635/papajohn1964/Outside.jpg)
Then I saw this one on the inside!
![Image](http://i1143.photobucket.com/albums/n635/papajohn1964/Inside.jpg)
I was thinking about sending them an e-mail but decided to just let it be so they don't 30-06 the place.
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
And that was the right decision.papajohn1964 wrote:
I was thinking about sending them an e-mail but decided to just let it be so they don't 30-06 the place.
Mmmmpapajohn1964 wrote:Carne Guisada of course!!!
I like the blue felony warning signs much better than the red 51% signs.pbwalker wrote:They are required by the TABC to put up that second sign. You can carry right past it...
And your porcelain, fully automatic Street Sweeper too!sjfcontrol wrote:Hmmm, "No Handguns", huh? Guess it's OK to bring my AK in with me.
Aren't we allowed to carry long-arms legally open.sjfcontrol wrote:Hmmm, "No Handguns", huh? Guess it's OK to bring my AK in with me.
Yes, AFAIK. But not into private property where the owner doesn't allow it. Just like any other firearm, or any other object for that matter.GhostTX wrote:Aren't we allowed to carry long-arms legally open.sjfcontrol wrote:Hmmm, "No Handguns", huh? Guess it's OK to bring my AK in with me.
This amazing new modern wonder of gun control sign doesn't even stop people with handguns... such a time we live in! I vote we call it the "Pelosi Sign", since it does nothing for anybody, looks tacky, and takes up too much spacesjfcontrol wrote:My point was that sign wouldn't stop somebody with firearms other than handguns.