Maybe a tiara with a diamond-encrusted CHL badge/star front and center?RPB wrote:I want a CHL sash to go with the badge. Preferably a silk yellow one, maybe velvet in the Winter.![]()
![rlol "rlol"](./images/smilies/rlol.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Maybe a tiara with a diamond-encrusted CHL badge/star front and center?RPB wrote:I want a CHL sash to go with the badge. Preferably a silk yellow one, maybe velvet in the Winter.![]()
According to Charles Cotton's post, CHL holders go through the SAME line as employees. I would expect most folks going through that line to be employees.gemini wrote:I saw a short video on the news the other night. It showed the DPS officers manning the check points.
It also showed a good sized sign on the entry lane "CHL here". They may as well put a hunter orange
pirate hat on your head. If you were trying to be discrete.
I think metal detectors at the Texas capital is totally unnecessary and a huge waste of tax payer money.
If our state legislators are that afraid of the voting population............
What's next? Removal of footwear, belts etc etc.....airport style security?
Correct; the line is for employees and CHL's and as you say, the ratio of employees to CHL's will be huge. Except of course when 3,000 lobbyists get a CHL so they can avoid the long lines!davidtx wrote:According to Charles Cotton's post, CHL holders go through the SAME line as employees. I would expect most folks going through that line to be employees.gemini wrote:I saw a short video on the news the other night. It showed the DPS officers manning the check points.
It also showed a good sized sign on the entry lane "CHL here". They may as well put a hunter orange
pirate hat on your head. If you were trying to be discrete.
I think metal detectors at the Texas capital is totally unnecessary and a huge waste of tax payer money.
If our state legislators are that afraid of the voting population............
What's next? Removal of footwear, belts etc etc.....airport style security?
and?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Yes, all four entrances will have metal detectors and each will have employee lines that will be used by CHL's.dehalter wrote:Thanks Charles,
I appreciate the quick and excellent reply. Are these "express lanes" at every entrance?
Chas.
my point was a sign "CHL here". Discrete? No. And your point is CHL goes through one of the 4 entrance lines available todavidtx wrote:According to Charles Cotton's post, CHL holders go through the SAME line as employees. I would expect most folks going through that line to be employees.gemini wrote:I saw a short video on the news the other night. It showed the DPS officers manning the check points.
It also showed a good sized sign on the entry lane "CHL here". They may as well put a hunter orange
pirate hat on your head. If you were trying to be discrete.
I think metal detectors at the Texas capital is totally unnecessary and a huge waste of tax payer money.
If our state legislators are that afraid of the voting population............
What's next? Removal of footwear, belts etc etc.....airport style security?
Is that a good thing???Charles L. Cotton wrote:Correct; the line is for employees and CHL's and as you say, the ratio of employees to CHL's will be huge. Except of course when 3,000 lobbyists get a CHL so they can avoid the long lines!davidtx wrote:According to Charles Cotton's post, CHL holders go through the SAME line as employees. I would expect most folks going through that line to be employees.gemini wrote:I saw a short video on the news the other night. It showed the DPS officers manning the check points.
It also showed a good sized sign on the entry lane "CHL here". They may as well put a hunter orange
pirate hat on your head. If you were trying to be discrete.
I think metal detectors at the Texas capital is totally unnecessary and a huge waste of tax payer money.
If our state legislators are that afraid of the voting population............
What's next? Removal of footwear, belts etc etc.....airport style security?![]()
Chas.
That should work the same as out of staters carrying under LEOSA.stevie_d_64 wrote:Ok, for my next trick...
What about the out of state permitees and licensees???
The folks we have reciprocity with???
Their "plastic" may be a little different than our domestic "plastic"...Their info may not be readable by our system...
Are they going to be subjected to an embarassing, and public scrutiny to have access to our state facility when they visit???
If their "plastic" is not compatable with our machines...
Just a thought...
Maybe this was a deliberate tactic by the State to increase both CHL numbers and revenue.Charles L. Cotton wrote: Except of course when 3,000 lobbyists get a CHL so they can avoid the long lines!![]()
Chas.
What kind of garbage is that? Caliber for their records? That's bunk if ya ask me...stevie_d_64 wrote:I am pulled aside, asked the caliber of my weapon (for their records)
Guy at the store said it was High Caliber is why it costs so much.pbwalker wrote:What kind of garbage is that? Caliber for their records? That's bunk if ya ask me...stevie_d_64 wrote:I am pulled aside, asked the caliber of my weapon (for their records)![]()
I'd just reply back with "The dangerous one..."
stevie_d_64 wrote:Ok, for my next trick...
What about the out of state permitees and licensees???
The folks we have reciprocity with???
Their "plastic" may be a little different than our domestic "plastic"...Their info may not be readable by our system...
Are they going to be subjected to an embarassing, and public scrutiny to have access to our state facility when they visit???
If their "plastic" is not compatable with our machines...
Just a thought...
That's not possible. A Texas CHL will swipe their license and it instantly confirms an active CHL by sending a query to DPS computers. This isn't possible with out of state licenses.ErnieP wrote:I'm sure Charles knows, but are out-of-state CHL holders treated the same as Texas CHLs?stevie_d_64 wrote:Ok, for my next trick...
What about the out of state permitees and licensees???
The folks we have reciprocity with???
Their "plastic" may be a little different than our domestic "plastic"...Their info may not be readable by our system...
Are they going to be subjected to an embarassing, and public scrutiny to have access to our state facility when they visit???
If their "plastic" is not compatable with our machines...
Just a thought...
Its actually a move that protects us.blue wrote:-
Sorry, but this one looks like a Huge slap in the face to CHLers and opening a BIG can of worms.
Blue