Oh good grief!USA1 wrote:I save and print all PM'sjoe817 wrote:USA1 wrote:Excuse me while I go and delete every post I've ever made.![]()
![]()
![]()
Boy I'm sure glad I've NEVER posted anything that could be remotely conceived as personal.![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9929/e9929ef1dc2c41919022b6c76d226703afcc5807" alt="ToeTap :totap:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1a89/b1a89c430b02223e90df3fb8889e407abb6c9c3c" alt="Shocked :shock:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9daaf/9daafdabc81ec5689e7966a090052e9adc29e496" alt="Jester :biggrinjester:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fc79/5fc79b9c34d22661c5497fb36575152aa3bed3ff" alt="rlol "rlol""
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Oh good grief!USA1 wrote:I save and print all PM'sjoe817 wrote:USA1 wrote:Excuse me while I go and delete every post I've ever made.![]()
![]()
![]()
Boy I'm sure glad I've NEVER posted anything that could be remotely conceived as personal.![]()
That probably wouldn't help. Just because you've "deleted" it doesn't mean it's really gone (although someone with experience in forum software would have to confirm that), especially if another member quoted your post, because YOU can't edit his/her post.USA1 wrote:Excuse me while I go and delete every post I've ever made.
You're probably right. All the more reason to be extra cautious about what we say here and what actions we takeLarryH wrote:That probably wouldn't help. Just because you've "deleted" it doesn't mean it's really goneUSA1 wrote:Excuse me while I go and delete every post I've ever made.
security violation?PeteCamp wrote:Forget the Internet. Having worked at a sensitive defense job for a number of years while going to school, I can tell you that the technology existed (in the mid 1980's and was/is presumably used) to read key presses on a keyboard from low earth orbit.![]()
We enclosed sensitive computer systems in a room built inside a Farady cage and protected in all kinds of ways. But never worry. The people who do such things are from the government, and they are here to help us.
As I am sure you know, Larry, your occupation being what is shown on your profile, if the government really wants to get at what you "deleted," it can get it off your personal computer even when you do not have a backup server, since when one deletes something it does not really delete anything, the computer just applies a code to the item "deleted" whch in essence says "as far as you know this is deleted, but I am really still there." You may rest assured that the feds and many state and local LEOs have the technical capability of resurrecting this material. In a pinch many people have been known to do a complete reformat of the disk drive if the deleted info was critical. For this reason I have destroyed many a hard drive when replacing computers at home and at the office, as they were both loaded with proprietary and privileged information, not, I hasten to add, evidence of my having committed a crime.LarryH wrote:For those who are old enough to remember the Iran-Contra hearings, one of the factors that gave Ollie North so much trouble was the fact that "deleted" emails were only deleted from his system, but were archived on the email server. I'd imagine the situation with the forum would be similar.USA1 wrote:Excuse me while I go and delete every post I've ever made.
It would probably be fairly easy just based on the dates in your message signature.92f-fan wrote:Assuming you haven't posted identifying information, think through how a prosecutor would tie entries here to you ?
If you didn't use your legal name as your handle a Google search wouldn't help. Even if you did - depending on your name and what they serached for they will likely get thousands to millions of results. How much time and expertise do they have to wade through that ?
No one said you had to agree. Its an opinion.57Coastie wrote:92f-fan wrote:Assuming you haven't posted identifying information, think through how a prosecutor would tie entries here to you ?
If you didn't use your legal name as your handle a Google search wouldn't help. Even if you did - depending on your name and what they serached for they will likely get thousands to millions of results. How much time and expertise do they have to wade through that ?
Assuming the prosecution was very technical and sure you were doing bad things on the Internet, they could attempt to subpoena every IP address you have been assigned and then subpoena every forum in a fishing expedition but I doubt that kind of fishing expedition would be approved.
IMO
Some how you would likely need to be tied to content here via offline means. In other words it would likely have to come up in interrogations.
Once all those hurdles were managed they would need to prove that the content was yours, was unaltered and was true.
"True??"
Keith is right, but you of course are entitled to your opinion. BTW, I just Googled "92f-fan" and got 8 hits, most of them being your contributions to this forum. If someone deludes himself by suggesting that his or her real name cannot be identified, he or she does so to their possible serious risk.
Like all of us, I respect Chas. and his tireless endeavors for us, but I will stick my neck out and guess that if asked he would confirm that with the law the way it has been demonstrated to be today it is quite likely that he might have to comply with a subpoena requiring him to identify you, given the right case. Let there by no misunderstanding. being the confirmed Liberal with a capital "L" that I am, I am distressed by the fact that most courts will do this today, but that doesn't change the fact that most will. I could probably prove this to your satisfaction by credibly saying here that I intend to kill a public figure, which, of course, is not the case. I would not be surprised if the NSA or DHS read the post before you did and I soon heard a knock on my door, if it were not shattered and broken open.
One's opinion is one's own, and all are at liberty to express them, but others are certainly not required by the 1st Amendment to agree with them.
I stand by mine.
Jim
If the real evidence they find isn't enough, they can manufacture any evidence they want once they have your computer.57Coastie wrote:As I am sure you know, Larry, your occupation being what is shown on your profile, if the government really wants to get at what you "deleted," it can get it off your personal computer
I always wondered who did that.surprise_i'm_armed wrote:
I was the one who let the dogs out (Baha men anyone?);