I would think you are correct. So we have two ways in which the hotel's 30.06 is not binding if you're staying the night.mr.72 wrote:Again, we would get to the definition of "traveling". But I would think that 46.02(b)(2) "on his own premises or premises under his control" coupled with the MPA exceptions allowing you to carry between your residence and car would invalidate the posting on a hotel for all intents and purposes, for any guests of the hotel who are actually staying in the hotel, CHL or not. So my wife, for example, who doesn't have a CHL, can CC from the car up to our hotel room and back again, right past the sign, by a precise reading of the law, no?seamusTX wrote:Remember, if you're traveling, 46.02 does not apply. You can legally carry anywhere except the places prohibited in PC 46.03.
- Jim
If you are there utilizing a conference room for some meeting (which appears to be the case) or just to visit the restaurant etc., then MPA + 46.02 exceptions will not help and I would think the 30.06 sign would be in force.
Also, the way I see the wording, you can even OC while traveling, as 46.02 is not applicable to those traveling so the exception afforded by the CHL is not applicable. Technically in this case you can even OC, because you're travelling, from your car to your hotel room. I know that's not advisable, but would someone show me the sequence in the TPC where that's not allowed? I'm not trying to be knuckleheaded, but I don't see it.