Saw a "first" today...

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


n5wd
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:16 am
Location: Ponder, TX

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#16

Post by n5wd »

The Wall wrote:In my opinion the posting of any sign that tells you guns aren't allowed is the same as them telling you in person.
And you know what they say about opinions, don't you? :tiphat: :banghead:
NRA-Life member, NRA Instructor, NRA RSO, TSRA member,
Vietnam (AF) Veteran -- Amateur Extra class amateur radio operator: N5WD

Email: CHL@centurylink.net

Topic author
atx2a
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#17

Post by atx2a »

rotor wrote:
atx2a wrote:
The Wall wrote:In my opinion the posting of any sign that tells you guns aren't allowed is the same as them telling you in person. Just because they don't have the 30.06 or 30.07 sign doesn't give you the right to carry on their premises. Just means you will have to leave when you get caught and you are supporting a business that doesn't want you to be there. No different than having a No Pets sign, or No Shirt, No Shoes, No service sign. IMHO
What I failed to mention was that I went in, dropped a "you lost my business today" card, and went somewhere else for lunch.
Why did they lose your business? Unless they asked you to leave you could legally carry there. Now if they asked you to leave that's a different matter.
They lost my business because, while the sign is not effective notice, I understand their intent. And a criminal understands by that sign that chances are good that those inside would be open season. I tend to stay away from "gun free" zones, legally posted or not.
Austin, TX
Speak softly and have a helluva double tap.
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9578
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#18

Post by RoyGBiv »

JALLEN wrote:No soup for you!
:lol:

Image
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26866
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#19

Post by The Annoyed Man »

sweatmachine wrote:I saw the Soup Nazi's sign the other day and took a picture of it. Bird's Barber Shop had a similar "ghostbusters" style sign up.

I have to wonder, are they just ignorant and think they're covered here, or are they pandering to their ignorant gun hating customers to make them feel warm & fuzzy and knowingly allowing concealed carry with their unofficial signage?

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

No soup for you!
soup nazi.jpg
Untuck your shirt and walk right in.......have all the soup you want. The sign is totally irrelevant for either open or concealed, but if you conceal you won't have some ignoramus yammering in your ear about effective notice.....
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: Alvin
Contact:

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#20

Post by SewTexas »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
sweatmachine wrote:I saw the Soup Nazi's sign the other day and took a picture of it. Bird's Barber Shop had a similar "ghostbusters" style sign up.

I have to wonder, are they just ignorant and think they're covered here, or are they pandering to their ignorant gun hating customers to make them feel warm & fuzzy and knowingly allowing concealed carry with their unofficial signage?

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

No soup for you!
soup nazi.jpg
Untuck your shirt and walk right in.......have all the soup you want. The sign is totally irrelevant for either open or concealed, but if you conceal you won't have some ignoramus yammering in your ear about effective notice.....

exactly.

I CC past non-compliant signs. What they don't know won't hurt them or me.
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
User avatar

chamberc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 645
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:45 pm
Location: Las Colinas

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#21

Post by chamberc »

SewTexas wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
sweatmachine wrote:I saw the Soup Nazi's sign the other day and took a picture of it. Bird's Barber Shop had a similar "ghostbusters" style sign up.

I have to wonder, are they just ignorant and think they're covered here, or are they pandering to their ignorant gun hating customers to make them feel warm & fuzzy and knowingly allowing concealed carry with their unofficial signage?

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

No soup for you!
soup nazi.jpg
Untuck your shirt and walk right in.......have all the soup you want. The sign is totally irrelevant for either open or concealed, but if you conceal you won't have some ignoramus yammering in your ear about effective notice.....

exactly.

I CC past non-compliant signs. What they don't know won't hurt them or me.
You have to remember that non-compliant is your opinion. Today I read about a perfectly legal sign that the "poster" said couldn't be read because of sunlight. I can promise you, in a court of law, that sort of "non-compliance" isn't going to hold up.
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
LTC since 2000
http://www.texas3006.com

sweatmachine
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 10:12 am
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#22

Post by sweatmachine »

chamberc wrote:
You have to remember that non-compliant is your opinion. Today I read about a perfectly legal sign that the "poster" said couldn't be read because of sunlight. I can promise you, in a court of law, that sort of "non-compliance" isn't going to hold up.
Carrying past a 30.06 is only a class C misdemeanor. I don't think that will make it to trial but IANAL & YMMV :smash:
User avatar

Texas_Blaze
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 454
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 4:55 pm

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#23

Post by Texas_Blaze »

sweatmachine wrote:
chamberc wrote:
You have to remember that non-compliant is your opinion. Today I read about a perfectly legal sign that the "poster" said couldn't be read because of sunlight. I can promise you, in a court of law, that sort of "non-compliance" isn't going to hold up.
Carrying past a 30.06 is only a class C misdemeanor. I don't think that will make it to trial but IANAL & YMMV :smash:
One of the things I love about the new year.
Distinguished author of opinions and pro bono self proclaimed internet lawyer providing expert advice on what you should do and believe on all matters of life.
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13573
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#24

Post by C-dub »

The Wall wrote:In my opinion the posting of any sign that tells you guns aren't allowed is the same as them telling you in person. Just because they don't have the 30.06 or 30.07 sign doesn't give you the right to carry on their premises. Just means you will have to leave when you get caught and you are supporting a business that doesn't want you to be there. No different than having a No Pets sign, or No Shirt, No Shoes, No service sign. IMHO
Your opinion is duly noted. :roll:
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8403
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#25

Post by Abraham »

The Wall,

Gun buster signs can be ignored, but if you think they're legitimate don't go in, the rest of us will...
User avatar

E10
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 412
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:07 am
Location: Red Bear Ranch

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#26

Post by E10 »

Shadow41 wrote:Well, at least they picked a nice picture of a pretty gun ...
Yeah, I thought so, too. What is that, a two-tone High Power?

The Wall
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:59 am

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#27

Post by The Wall »

n5wd wrote:
The Wall wrote:In my opinion the posting of any sign that tells you guns aren't allowed is the same as them telling you in person.
And you know what they say about opinions, don't you? :tiphat: :banghead:
No! What do they say?

Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4339
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#28

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

chamberc wrote:
SewTexas wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:
sweatmachine wrote:I saw the Soup Nazi's sign the other day and took a picture of it. Bird's Barber Shop had a similar "ghostbusters" style sign up.

I have to wonder, are they just ignorant and think they're covered here, or are they pandering to their ignorant gun hating customers to make them feel warm & fuzzy and knowingly allowing concealed carry with their unofficial signage?

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

No soup for you!
soup nazi.jpg
Untuck your shirt and walk right in.......have all the soup you want. The sign is totally irrelevant for either open or concealed, but if you conceal you won't have some ignoramus yammering in your ear about effective notice.....

exactly.

I CC past non-compliant signs. What they don't know won't hurt them or me.
You have to remember that non-compliant is your opinion. Today I read about a perfectly legal sign that the "poster" said couldn't be read because of sunlight. I can promise you, in a court of law, that sort of "non-compliance" isn't going to hold up.
What case law are you basing your legal opinion on?
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#29

Post by joe817 »

The Wall wrote:
n5wd wrote:
The Wall wrote:In my opinion the posting of any sign that tells you guns aren't allowed is the same as them telling you in person.
And you know what they say about opinions, don't you? :tiphat: :banghead:
No! What do they say?
Are we confusing the word 'opinion' to the word 'assume' :biggrinjester: ?
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380

chandler583
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:25 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Saw a "first" today...

#30

Post by chandler583 »

I think what The Wall is trying to convey is that the business has clearly stated they are not supporters of the second amendment, thus The Wall will not patronize such business regardless of sign compliance.
10/17/12 Docs Mailed
11/29/12 Plastic in Hand
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”