Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
This guy will do significant damage to 2nd Amendment rights. Word is quite a few republican GOP establishment highly regard him.
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-mem ... ck-garland
He would reverse Heller.
On top of that, he is from Chicago.
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-mem ... ck-garland
He would reverse Heller.
On top of that, he is from Chicago.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:03 pm
- Location: Webster
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
I'm hoping this election cycle has taught the 'establishment' republicans a thing or 2 and that they will stick to their guns and not even allow the POTUS nomination a hearing, much less confirm any 'moderates' that he puts up.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny" - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5049
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
- Location: Irving, Texas
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
They should not accept any nominations from Obama
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
TSRA-Life member
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Call your Congressman.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 9316
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Good article mojo84. Thanks for posting. It would mean the end of 2A rights as we know it, if this guy makes it to the S.C.mojo84 wrote:This guy will do significant damage to 2nd Amendment rights. Word is quite a few republican GOP establishment highly regard him.
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-mem ... ck-garland
He would reverse Heller. On top of that, he is from Chicago.
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7832
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
- Location: Near San Jacinto
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Thanks for posting.joe817 wrote:Good article mojo84. Thanks for posting. It would mean the end of 2A rights as we know it, if this guy makes it to the S.C.mojo84 wrote:This guy will do significant damage to 2nd Amendment rights. Word is quite a few republican GOP establishment highly regard him.
http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-mem ... ck-garland
He would reverse Heller. On top of that, he is from Chicago.
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Looks like McConnell made it pretty clear again today that they will not even allow a hearing. Hope that's true.
Austin, TX
Speak softly and have a helluva double tap.
Speak softly and have a helluva double tap.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:35 pm
- Location: Little Elm, TX
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Oh...not even. They are doubling down in fact by trying to steal the nomination from Trump and install a Ryan/Kasich ticket. And I am most decidedly NOT a Trump voter, I just hate subversion of the will of the voters.Pariah3j wrote:I'm hoping this election cycle has taught the 'establishment' republicans a thing or 2 and that they will stick to their guns and not even allow the POTUS nomination a hearing, much less confirm any 'moderates' that he puts up.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
- Location: North Dallas
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
It's come down to the last two people the establishment wanted vying for candidacy. It's a beautiful thing.Redneck_Buddha wrote:Oh...not even. They are doubling down in fact by trying to steal the nomination from Trump and install a Ryan/Kasich ticket. And I am most decidedly NOT a Trump voter, I just hate subversion of the will of the voters.Pariah3j wrote:I'm hoping this election cycle has taught the 'establishment' republicans a thing or 2 and that they will stick to their guns and not even allow the POTUS nomination a hearing, much less confirm any 'moderates' that he puts up.
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2015 5:03 pm
- Location: Webster
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Bitter Clinger wrote:It's come down to the last two people the establishment wanted vying for candidacy. It's a beautiful thing.Redneck_Buddha wrote:Oh...not even. They are doubling down in fact by trying to steal the nomination from Trump and install a Ryan/Kasich ticket. And I am most decidedly NOT a Trump voter, I just hate subversion of the will of the voters.Pariah3j wrote:I'm hoping this election cycle has taught the 'establishment' republicans a thing or 2 and that they will stick to their guns and not even allow the POTUS nomination a hearing, much less confirm any 'moderates' that he puts up.
Some talking heads have suggested Ryan/Kasich - but others have said they plan to allow the process work, and the likelyhood of someone other then the 2 frontrunners being a valid or accepted choice would be a fools errand. I wonder if in the end that Cruz will get their backing because there has been alot of 'guess we'll have to eat crow' type comments about Cruz from people like Gramnesty and others of his ilk.
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny" - Thomas Jefferson
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 9043
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
- Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
The Biden Rule.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
- Location: Austin
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
Liberals like to think that only applied to when it benefited them, not when it could benefit the other side!mojo84 wrote:The Biden Rule.
Keep calm and carry.
Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
Re: Senate must not consent to Merrick Garland
VIA Twitter:
https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/7 ... 4999806976
from
@SenateDems
Senate Democrats
Verified account
284,000 Followers
McConnell spoke to Garland by phone today. He won't meet with him. Readout via McConnell's office: see https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/7 ... 2330080257
https://twitter.com/SenateDems/status/7 ... 4999806976
from
@SenateDems
Senate Democrats
Verified account
284,000 Followers
`8 Republicans now willing to meet with Garland:
Collins
Flake
Ayotte
Kirk
Portman
Inhofe
Grassley
Cochran
McConnell spoke to Garland by phone today. He won't meet with him. Readout via McConnell's office: see https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/7 ... 2330080257
Last edited by NotRPB on Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:20 pm, edited 5 times in total.