SB 664 by Ellis

[Charles L. Cotton]

Senator Rodney Ellis has introduced a bill to make the "premises of a law enforcement facility" off-limits to CHL holders.

Not only is this unnecessary, the bill defines "law enforcement facility" grossly over-broad.

(4) "Law enforcement facility" includes any building
or portion of a building containing offices used for the official
business of peace officers, special investigators, or adjunct
police officers as defined by Article 2.12, 2.121, 2.122, 2.123, or
2.124, Code of Criminal Procedure.

This bill was filed on 2/22 and has not yet been referred to a committee. Let's keep our eyes on this one too.

Regards,
Chas.

[fiftycal]

Senator Rodney Ellis has introduced a bill to make the "premises of a law enforcement facility" off-limits to CHL holders.

Not only is this unnecessary, the bill defines "law enforcement facility" grossly over-broad.

(4) "Law enforcement facility" includes any building
or portion of a building containing offices used for the official
business of peace officers, special investigators, or adjunct
police officers as defined by Article 2.12, 2.121, 2.122, 2.123, or
2.124, Code of Criminal Procedure.

Does this include Dunkin' Donuts?

Sorry, I couldn't help myself.

[Charles L. Cotton]

I told you it was overly broad!

Chas.

[ralewis]

i really doubt this will pass. it seems like a sneaky attempt to make lots of places off limits to CHLers, but i think there are enough pro-2A folks in the legislature to kill this.