Good one, Dan! I love it!phddan wrote: Get a sign, give them verbal, or shake in fear. Your choice.
Dan
![Smile5 :smilelol5:](./images/smilies/smilielol5.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton
Show me once where I said anything about taking away the rights of others to defend themselves. If service people are going to be afraid of making service calls, I suggest that maybe they find new work preferably one that doesn't have a perceived element of danger to it.pbandjelly wrote:Your poor grasp on English aside, accusing me of having an addiction may be construed as a personal attack.Right2Carry wrote:You brought it up, not me. If you don't like beating a dead horse than I would suggest you seek professional help with your addiction.
What I brought up, was a conversation about the same topic. Since you're still here, you should notice that happens rather often.
Many of us, we who know how to hit the "quote" button, reference older threads that pertain to the same topic.
I never challenged that you had the "right" to your own opinion.
funny, you get up in arms about your "right" to your own opinion, but other's "right" to defend themselves is of no concern.
Remove the words "service person" from your post and replace with "citizen". Now you can see that your intellect makes about as much sense as Micheal Moore.Right2Carry wrote: . . . . . If a service person prints or exposes his firearm how do you PROVE that he is a CHL holder if all he does is tell you he is? . . . . .
Ahhhhh so now we start with the personal attacks. I wasn't the one in this thread stating that we can trust the service person who is in my house because he is a CHL holder. Personally I don't care what happens on the street or in a business, it is none of my business.iflyabeech wrote:Remove the words "service person" from your post and replace with "citizen". Now you can see that your intellect makes about as much sense as Micheal Moore.Right2Carry wrote: . . . . . If a service person prints or exposes his firearm how do you PROVE that he is a CHL holder if all he does is tell you he is? . . . . .
The answer is obvious. If a serviceman flashes. You can ask if he has a CHL. If he responds affirmative. You can ask to see his CHL. You can ask him to leave if he doesn't have one.Right2Carry wrote: IF people on this forum are going to use as an argument that the service person is trustworthy because he has a CHL, than I want to know how to verify this claim. See I already know the answer but I want to hear it from those on this board that say trust the guy because he TOLD you he is a CHL holder.
I find it amazing that the same people on here who see a bad guy behind every bush, rock, car and tree, would all of a sudden take the word of a guy who is a complete stranger in your home performing service work.
Once again the question has been avoided.
andywhite.net wrote:My day job requires me to call on my customers in their homes.
As a new CHL holder, I'm still wrestling with carrying in the customers' homes.
Any input?
Thanks.
phddan wrote:If some plumber is rooting around undee the sink, there is no reason he can't go over and watch and even help.
No No No No No![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Good gravy, I can't believe you are serious. It's bad enough when grown ups get in the work space, but your going to let a child watch and help???!!!!!
That child ought to be in another room, or at least no where near a service man.
Wow
Dan
Thats exactly what I am saying.OK,
hang on a sec, I grew up "helping"all the service people who came to the house, are you telling me this is not accepted here?
I concur.phddan wrote:Thats exactly what I am saying.OK,
hang on a sec, I grew up "helping"all the service people who came to the house, are you telling me this is not accepted here?
Service people have tools that are heavy, sharp, and dangerous. And you think it is a good idea for your 4 year old to be playing with that???? If the service person is concentrating on their job at hand, it is very hard to not bump, elbow, or step on a little 4 year old that is close.
Dan
Hey man, not a personal attack. You used the term intellect previously and I was expanding it. What I meant was your argument makes no sense. How does anyone prove he is a CHL holder? ANSWER: He doesn't have to prove anything to a non-LEO. You are arguing like an anti, and they make no sense! Sorry but a spade is a spade!iflyabeech wrote:Remove the words "service person" from your post and replace with "citizen". Now you can see that your intellect makes about as much sense as Micheal Moore.Right2Carry wrote: . . . . . If a service person prints or exposes his firearm how do you PROVE that he is a CHL holder if all he does is tell you he is? . . . . .
phddan wrote:Gentlemen, let's keep this civil to avoid the lockdown![]()
Dan