Money?rdcrags wrote:What is the difference between "citizen's arrest" and "kidnapping"?Good thing you didn't get involved and try to hold anyone at gunpoint until the LEOs got there... an hour later
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9daaf/9daafdabc81ec5689e7966a090052e9adc29e496" alt="Jester :biggrinjester:"
Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton
Money?rdcrags wrote:What is the difference between "citizen's arrest" and "kidnapping"?Good thing you didn't get involved and try to hold anyone at gunpoint until the LEOs got there... an hour later
A jury?rdcrags wrote:What is the difference between "citizen's arrest" and "kidnapping"?Good thing you didn't get involved and try to hold anyone at gunpoint until the LEOs got there... an hour later
TX CHL 1997
CO CHP 2005
There might be a reason you don't understand it. The law reads (Texas Penal Code Subsection 9.34 (a) "A person is justified in using force, but not deadly force, against another when and to the degree he reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent the other from committing suicide or inflicting serious bodily injury to himself." (b) "A person is justified in using both force and deadly force against another when and to the degree he reasonably believes the force or deadly force is immediately necessary to preserve the other's life in an emergency."C-dub wrote:Ironic, isn't it? I've never understood this one.dicion wrote: You are authorized to use deadly force to prevent a suicide attempt.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... (Jefferson quoting Beccaria)
... tyrants accomplish their purposes ...by disarming the people, and making it an offense to keep arms. - Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story, 1840
I've got to believe that the PD would have arrived much faster if they had been told someone was holding a person at gunpoint. Not that I'm advocating that, but I think it would get their attention.Fangs wrote:Good thing you didn't get involved and try to hold anyone at gunpoint until the LEOs got there... an hour later
another scenario would be if that person was in a wreck and the car was on fire and their hand was trapped with no hope of being freed and you made a decision to amputate the hand to save their life, or any other emergency where you had to cut or use deadly force to save their life.baldeagle wrote:(b) "A person is justified in using both force and deadly force against another when and to the degree he reasonably believes the force or deadly force is immediately necessary to preserve the other's life in an emergency."
So the purpose of the use of deadly force must be to preserve the life of the suicidal person and may only be used when it is "immediately necessary....in an emergency."
Some possible scenarios are; the person has a gun pointed to their head and you shoot their hand to knock the gun away, or the person is about to jump into traffic or in front of a train and you shoot them in the leg to disable them. But shooting a suicidal person center mass probably won't be looked upon favorably in a court of law.