Page 1 of 3
David Spade
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:12 pm
by jbirds1210
David Spade donates 100K to purchase patrol rifles for the Phoenix Police Department. Pretty neat stuff.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ent ... 77958.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Jason
Re: David Spade
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:36 pm
by flintknapper
Excellent!
I am sure the dept. will be better off for it...and it is a wonderful gesture on Spade's part.
Hat off to you David Spade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5508/b5508f8a183c0449de230eca4e2b8782220adba0" alt="tiphat :tiphat:"
Re: David Spade
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:38 pm
by atxgun
I reposted this on another internet forum and found one of the responses amusing
Where the hell did David Spade get $100,000?
But in all seriousness, kudos to Spade.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:37 pm
by Skipper5
What a great gesture of good citizenery.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:29 am
by nitrogen
Isn't that technically a straw purchase?
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 7:56 am
by HKUSP45C
No, Nitrogen, it isn't even a "pretend technically" straw purchase.
A straw purchase is not defined as one person buying a gun for another person. That is perfectly legal (federally, local laws may differ) in just about every circumstance.
A straw purchase occurs when a person buys a gun for someone whom they know is denied possession or purchase by law. I doubt anyone on the Phoenix Police Department fits that description.
Further, he donated money to the department to purchase equipment, he didn't go out and buy 50 AR-15 and then distribute them personally to the officers, though doing so would also have been perfectly legal.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:36 am
by WillieD
That is awesome to hear. It is good to see that some celebrities support this kind of cause.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:50 am
by DoubleJ
The Article wrote:The one-time Phoenix resident donated $100,000 so that the department can buy approximately 50 AR-15 rifles.
uh, what kind of crap deal did they get that AR's cost $2000 a piece???? you know they ain't comin' with flashlights and red dots!
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:59 am
by agbullet2k1
DoubleJ wrote:The Article wrote:The one-time Phoenix resident donated $100,000 so that the department can buy approximately 50 AR-15 rifles.
uh, what kind of crap deal did they get that AR's cost $2000 a piece???? you know they ain't comin' with flashlights and red dots!
They're on the aisle next to the $200 hammers.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:01 pm
by Liberty
DoubleJ wrote:The Article wrote:The one-time Phoenix resident donated $100,000 so that the department can buy approximately 50 AR-15 rifles.
uh, what kind of crap deal did they get that AR's cost $2000 a piece???? you know they ain't comin' with flashlights and red dots!
There will be ammo, and cases or mounts for the patrol units. maybe some optics. spare parts for the armory. A lot more goes to outfitting a rifle in a major Police Dept. than just the cost of the rifle. Sometimes even training costs gets put into the budget for a purchase like this.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:33 pm
by WarHawk-AVG
$100 grand for him is like you giving a $20 to a meter maid to watch your car
Good gesture..cool of a Hollywierd actor to step up and assist the police..but far cry from curtailing the anti gun agenda of Hollywierd
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 1:46 pm
by Captain Matt
agbullet2k1 wrote:They're on the aisle next to the $200 hammers.
It's not a $200 hammer. It's a $200 tax.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d003e/d003e28b766a51de5d9c7a2c19b95e5ae998ff33" alt="Image"
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:07 pm
by kitty
I am actually on another message board talking to people who don't think he should have done this. They honestly do not think the police should need AR's, and this is a conservative board.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77567/77567c6bb8c50d7a6ffcd30c55051b9f940027f0" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Unbelievable.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:22 pm
by flintknapper
kitty wrote:I am actually on another message board talking to people who don't think he should have done this. They honestly do not think the police should need AR's, and this is a conservative board.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77567/77567c6bb8c50d7a6ffcd30c55051b9f940027f0" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Unbelievable.
Hi Kitty,
Most of us here don't think the police "
SHOULD need AR's" either. But as the complexion of crimes has changed, so have tactics and weapons for LEO.
"Should" they "need" high powered weaponry? Not in the society we lived in 30 yrs.> ago, but these are not those times (unfortunately).
I would wager...if you asked the average patrolman if he/she is happy about needing increasingly powerful/tactical weaponry...they would say no. Everyone would love to go back to the days where police mostly wrote speeding tickets, cleared the way for parades and funerals, and occasionally ran into a bonified bad guy. Times have changed, and not for the better.
Re: David Spade
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:39 pm
by The Annoyed Man
You mean like Barney Fife - with an unloaded .38 Spcl revolver and a single boolit in his shirt pocket?