Yeah, but I'm not AndyC.AndyC wrote:Not necessarily true.nightmare69 wrote:Honestly, in a life threatening situation you will never see your sights.


Moderator: carlson1
Yeah, but I'm not AndyC.AndyC wrote:Not necessarily true.nightmare69 wrote:Honestly, in a life threatening situation you will never see your sights.
Touché. You got me there. I guess I'll have to keep my NS since I also subscribe to that philosophy.AndyC wrote:All of that presupposes that they can shoot accurately - and that you're still where the light *used to be*. Me, I prefer a handheld flashlight plus the extra control of my weak hand on a gun (Harries or Rogers style) - but as you implied, the method used is definitely an individual choice.Charlies.Contingency wrote:I don't want them to shoot at the light because that's all they see, and have it right in front of my face. I carry various hand held flash lights in my off hand, and I extend it up and away from my body when applicable, so if somebody does start shooting, hopefully the light is blindin enough that they don't see my silouette, and they shoot at my light, which would be over two feet away from my body. I'd rather get shot in the arm, then shot in the face. That's just my approach, But I had coworkers that loved mouted lights because better gun control, so it's a compromise of what you want.
I prefer my gun to be pointing at whatever I'm clearing - and I've done a LOT of that. As for pulsing - yes. It always makes me chuckle watching a relay of "tactical shooters" run an entire stage with the flashlight on constantly. Good - they can draw the fire.VMI77 wrote:Another benefit of having the light off gun is that you're not pointing your gun at everything you're sweeping with your light. OTOH, in either case, aren't you supposed to be "pulsing" the light on for less than a second at a time, and moving in between?
Well, I prescribe to the "Have it and not need it than the reverse" philosophy, mate ;)C-dub wrote:Yeah, but I'm not AndyC.AndyC wrote:Not necessarily true.nightmare69 wrote:Honestly, in a life threatening situation you will never see your sights.![]()
Stop blaming the flu, we know it was you.AndyC wrote:Ugh - I can't believe I said "prescribe" and not "subscribe". I'm blaming flu.
Of course, I fall to the harries position when I'm no trying to hold my light away from me. I can't do the rogers hold between my index and middle finger because it's too awkward, and I wear a ring that makes it painful to hold between my middle and ring finger. I like carry a maglight anyway, I always like having an aluminum "pipe" in my off hand if needed! But I also like my leatherman LED monarch, which fits perfectly in one of my old leather leatherman pouches on my duty belt.AndyC wrote:All of that presupposes that they can shoot accurately - and that you're still where the light *used to be*. Me, I prefer a handheld flashlight plus the extra control of my weak hand on a gun (Harries or Rogers style) - but as you implied, the method used is definitely an individual choice.
You will if everything else is dark and they're the only things showing light.nightmare69 wrote:I love my night sights on my Sig. We had a night qualification at the academy at from anchor point to 7yrds pitch black shooting off hand with no night sights. This made me get them on my duty weapon. Honestly, in a life threatening situation you will never see your sights.
To me, that seems to be dependent on the situation, and perhaps experience level. I think you're referring to sweeping in a combat scenario, whereas I'm referring to a home situation where others and pets may be present. I don't even like sweeping my dogs with my muzzle, but I agree, there are situations where pointing at what you're clearing is necessary. And realistically, that's probably what I'd end up doing, since I have lights on the guns I would use for defense at night, and might not find my flashlight so easily. And since it's just the wife and I now, and the dogs sleep in the bedroom with us, anyone at the end of my light is not likely to be a friendly.AndyC wrote:All of that presupposes that they can shoot accurately - and that you're still where the light *used to be*. Me, I prefer a handheld flashlight plus the extra control of my weak hand on a gun (Harries or Rogers style) - but as you implied, the method used is definitely an individual choice.Charlies.Contingency wrote:I don't want them to shoot at the light because that's all they see, and have it right in front of my face. I carry various hand held flash lights in my off hand, and I extend it up and away from my body when applicable, so if somebody does start shooting, hopefully the light is blindin enough that they don't see my silouette, and they shoot at my light, which would be over two feet away from my body. I'd rather get shot in the arm, then shot in the face. That's just my approach, But I had coworkers that loved mouted lights because better gun control, so it's a compromise of what you want.
I prefer my gun to be pointing at whatever I'm clearing - and I've done a LOT of that. As for pulsing - yes. It always makes me chuckle watching a relay of "tactical shooters" run an entire stage with the flashlight on constantly. Good - they can draw the fire.VMI77 wrote:Another benefit of having the light off gun is that you're not pointing your gun at everything you're sweeping with your light. OTOH, in either case, aren't you supposed to be "pulsing" the light on for less than a second at a time, and moving in between?
Well, I prescribe to the "Have it and not need it than the reverse" philosophy, mate ;)C-dub wrote:Yeah, but I'm not AndyC.AndyC wrote:Not necessarily true.nightmare69 wrote:Honestly, in a life threatening situation you will never see your sights.![]()
It is also pretty straightforward to point the handgun towards the ground about 15 feet in front of you (kind of midway between pointing it horizontally and at low ready). The indirect light emanating like a cone of light will still provide plenty of light to illuminate without pointing directly at a person. You can bounce the light off the floor to still search the room. Then, if it is someone who you really do need to point a firearm at, it is only raising the muzzle a touch to be on target.VMI77 wrote:... I think you're referring to sweeping in a combat scenario, whereas I'm referring to a home situation where others and pets may be present. I don't even like sweeping my dogs with my muzzle, but I agree, there are situations where pointing at what you're clearing is necessary.
I am not aware of any. Some indoor ranges may have a light that you can turn off in your lane. BassPro is like that, but it still doesn't get very dark. It's only moderate to low light at the darkest.TBJK wrote:Not to hijack your thread but where is there a range around here where we can practice "night time" firing?