People that get complacent with firearms
Moderator: carlson1
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:19 pm
- Location: Washington, UT
Re: People that get complacent with firearms
Stated nicely regarding other very human events: “Airbags were introduced in automobiles in the early 1990s, not to make driving safer but to make crashing safer. That’s an important distinction, because instead of starting from the assumption that we could do better as drivers, it was decided that we could not. We were not teachable. We would simply keep crashing no matter what. So we had to be protected – passively, as it were – during those crashes.” – Laurence Gonzales, Everyday Survival, Why Smart People Do Stupid Things
“Hope is an expensive commodity. It makes better sense to be prepared.” - Thucydides
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 12:49 am
- Location: North Richland Hills
Re: People that get complacent with firearms
I took mine out of my Ruger SR9c. What if your mag gets released in a fight? Being able to at least fire the round in the chamber could save your life. If you follow the 4 safety rules you don't need a mag safety or really any safety. Some exceptions being a drop safety or a thumb safety on a 1911. You should never trust a mechanical safety anyway. They can and do fail.Gordie Howe wrote:I am in favor of the Ruger semiauto design, where the gun doesnt fire, when the magazine is removed, even when a round is in the chamber.
That should be a mandatory feature of all new guns produced.
Re: People that get complacent with firearms
It just blows my mind that people can have an ND when they are cleaning or examining a gun. How hard is it to remember to check, unload, and double-check a gun before cleaning it or showing it to a friend?!
Re: People that get complacent with firearms
"That should be a mandatory feature of all new guns produced"
I'll add my "No Thanks" to this idea.
I WANT my pistol to fire if the magazine is out.
When it comes to guns, the word "mandatory" sounds a bit hoplophobic...
I'll add my "No Thanks" to this idea.
I WANT my pistol to fire if the magazine is out.
When it comes to guns, the word "mandatory" sounds a bit hoplophobic...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2574
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
- Location: Vernon, Texas
Re: People that get complacent with firearms
I own a Ruger SR9c. I have not taken the magazine disconnect safety out. However, I didn't buy it because it has one of those, either. I bought it because it fits my hand well and seems to feed pretty much everything I have put through it and I've had a good run with Ruger products. I would have been just as happy with it had it not had the magazine disconnect in it. The only reason I haven't pulled it out, I guess, is because I've never taken it that far apart before, just down to the major sub-assemblies. It cleans pretty easily without disassembling it completely. If I had to disassemble it all the way, I might leave it out when I put it back together. I think a magazine disconnect is kind of of something that's really not necessary.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:44 pm
- Location: Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea
Re: People that get complacent with firearms
I think it should be mandatory for people who want to impose dangerous things on me for "my safety" to be held under water for at least one hour after the bubbles stop.Gordie Howe wrote:I am in favor of the Ruger semiauto design, where the gun doesnt fire, when the magazine is removed, even when a round is in the chamber.
That should be a mandatory feature of all new guns produced.
For their safety.
Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston!
The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
The war is inevitable--and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.