That's true--this appears to be one of the rare examples where Texas firearms law is actually stricter than federal law. While federal law (which I posted previously) appears to say that any muzzle-loading firearm is OK, Texas law states it differently:srothstein wrote:As I understand the law, under both state and federal law, most (not all) black powder guns are not considered firearms. Even felons could have them for a hobby, home defense, or hunting. The reason i say most is that I think there was a legal question on the new in-line black powder guns that are not a replica of the antiques at all (and the law usually says made before 1899 or a replica of one - or words like that).
Actually, now that I look at the two side-by-side, the main difference is that Texas law does not include the third exemption, which is the general exemption for muzzleloaders.Sec. 46.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
(3) "Firearm" means any device designed, made, or adapted to expel a projectile through a barrel by using the energy generated by an explosion or burning substance or any device readily convertible to that use. Firearm does not include a firearm that may have, as an integral part, a folding knife blade or other characteristics of weapons made illegal by this chapter and that is:
(A) an antique or curio firearm manufactured before 1899; or
(B) a replica of an antique or curio firearm manufactured before 1899, but only if the replica does not use rim fire or center fire ammunition.
But I agree, consulting a lawyer is always a good idea in this kind of situation, especially when a mistake could result in someone going back to prison for a long time.