AndyC wrote:Nothing wrong with a 9mm IF you have the skills to make up for the smaller caliber.
![rlol "rlol"](./images/smilies/rlol.gif)
![rlol "rlol"](./images/smilies/rlol.gif)
![rlol "rlol"](./images/smilies/rlol.gif)
Moderator: carlson1
AndyC wrote:Nothing wrong with a 9mm IF you have the skills to make up for the smaller caliber.
I'm glad you asked. Your answer can be found here.C-dub wrote:Excellent solution. Hmmm, wonder where I can carry that third spare mag.Excaliber wrote:I went through the same soul searching and came up with a different solution - more .45 ACP magazines!Charles L. Cotton wrote:I just couldn't do it; I tried, but I just couldn't!! I now have a hi-cap handgun on my hip and I still have a 1911 .45ACP on my hip. I forgot about a gun I haven't shot in at least 15 to 20 years. It's a Paraordnance frame, Caspian slide, Wilson barrel (wouldn't do that again), Bomar sights and Brown parts. I had it built when I was shooting IPSC and Paraordnance was only making frames. It's a bit on the heavy side, but I was surprised that the felt weight isn't much if any heavier than my 5" Government Model. Life is good!Charles L. Cotton wrote:This is a very good read, even though it brings tears to the eyes of a die-hard 1911 .45ACP guy. I've been seriously considering switching to an M&P 9 for daily carry because of the greatly increased firepower. (17+1 with 1 or 2 more mags.) I've never worried about the ammo load until the ISIS issue came up. However, the extra ammo could play a role in "ordinary" shootings since it seems thugs have realized that there are more effective with multiple attackers.
My wife carries a Kimber Ultra Carry in .45ACP and she may switch to an M&P 9 Compact. She'd be doing it more because the reduced felt recoil would be easier on her hands. Arthritis is making it somewhat painful to shoot her Kimber.
Chas.
Chas.
Hah. Those aren't for double stack .45, but point taken. After looking around a bit there is certainly some interesting stuff out there if someone really wanted to carry a bunch of extra rounds of just about anything. I do have two double pouch paddle holsters, but don't really want to carry four double stack .45 13-round mags on my belt and the gun.Excaliber wrote:I'm glad you asked. Your answer can be found here.C-dub wrote:Excellent solution. Hmmm, wonder where I can carry that third spare mag.Excaliber wrote:I went through the same soul searching and came up with a different solution - more .45 ACP magazines!Charles L. Cotton wrote:I just couldn't do it; I tried, but I just couldn't!! I now have a hi-cap handgun on my hip and I still have a 1911 .45ACP on my hip. I forgot about a gun I haven't shot in at least 15 to 20 years. It's a Paraordnance frame, Caspian slide, Wilson barrel (wouldn't do that again), Bomar sights and Brown parts. I had it built when I was shooting IPSC and Paraordnance was only making frames. It's a bit on the heavy side, but I was surprised that the felt weight isn't much if any heavier than my 5" Government Model. Life is good!Charles L. Cotton wrote:This is a very good read, even though it brings tears to the eyes of a die-hard 1911 .45ACP guy. I've been seriously considering switching to an M&P 9 for daily carry because of the greatly increased firepower. (17+1 with 1 or 2 more mags.) I've never worried about the ammo load until the ISIS issue came up. However, the extra ammo could play a role in "ordinary" shootings since it seems thugs have realized that there are more effective with multiple attackers.
My wife carries a Kimber Ultra Carry in .45ACP and she may switch to an M&P 9 Compact. She'd be doing it more because the reduced felt recoil would be easier on her hands. Arthritis is making it somewhat painful to shoot her Kimber.
Chas.
Chas.
With 13 round spares, two oughta' do ya!C-dub wrote:Hah. Those aren't for double stack .45, but point taken. After looking around a bit there is certainly some interesting stuff out there if someone really wanted to carry a bunch of extra rounds of just about anything. I do have two double pouch paddle holsters, but don't really want to carry four double stack .45 13-round mags on my belt and the gun.Excaliber wrote:I'm glad you asked. Your answer can be found here.C-dub wrote:Excellent solution. Hmmm, wonder where I can carry that third spare mag.Excaliber wrote:I went through the same soul searching and came up with a different solution - more .45 ACP magazines!Charles L. Cotton wrote:I just couldn't do it; I tried, but I just couldn't!! I now have a hi-cap handgun on my hip and I still have a 1911 .45ACP on my hip. I forgot about a gun I haven't shot in at least 15 to 20 years. It's a Paraordnance frame, Caspian slide, Wilson barrel (wouldn't do that again), Bomar sights and Brown parts. I had it built when I was shooting IPSC and Paraordnance was only making frames. It's a bit on the heavy side, but I was surprised that the felt weight isn't much if any heavier than my 5" Government Model. Life is good!Charles L. Cotton wrote:This is a very good read, even though it brings tears to the eyes of a die-hard 1911 .45ACP guy. I've been seriously considering switching to an M&P 9 for daily carry because of the greatly increased firepower. (17+1 with 1 or 2 more mags.) I've never worried about the ammo load until the ISIS issue came up. However, the extra ammo could play a role in "ordinary" shootings since it seems thugs have realized that there are more effective with multiple attackers.
My wife carries a Kimber Ultra Carry in .45ACP and she may switch to an M&P 9 Compact. She'd be doing it more because the reduced felt recoil would be easier on her hands. Arthritis is making it somewhat painful to shoot her Kimber.
Chas.
Chas.
Yeah, but I have nearly as much capacity with my XDm 9mm.AdioSS wrote:Here's my thinking on that. The same advancements that have been done to modern 9mm ammo have also been applied to .40 S&W & .45ACP ammo.
If you really want capacity & low recoil then there's the 5.7x28