I wanted a P290 and I read and heard they had a lot of issues.mewalke wrote:MoJo wrote:
The Sig P290 would fit your criteria, but if you aren't opposed to .38 +P, a nice J frame or LCR would work really well for pocket carry.
![headscratch :headscratch](./images/smilies/headscratch.gif)
Moderator: carlson1
I wanted a P290 and I read and heard they had a lot of issues.mewalke wrote:MoJo wrote:
The Sig P290 would fit your criteria, but if you aren't opposed to .38 +P, a nice J frame or LCR would work really well for pocket carry.
When my favorite LGS gives me advice like that, I take it to heart. I'm heading out tonight, but I'll be back in-country in a couple weeks. I'll come see what you've got to offer!USA1 wrote:You should come see us. We have a few items that will fit your criteria.Vol Texan wrote:I'm looking for a small pocket-carry pistol, but I'm having difficulty finding what I'm looking for.
I'd like a 9mm, SA/DA, with no safety.
P.S. Avoid the Sig P250.
Ditto, but plenty small, and if price is an issue, you can get the CM9 for about half the price of a PM9, which is basically the same gun but with fewer refinements.rbraughn wrote:I have a Kahr PM9. Not the smallest out there, and kinda pricey, but I love mine.
The Annoyed Man wrote:Ditto, but plenty small, and if price is an issue, you can get the CM9 for about half the price of a PM9, which is basically the same gun but with fewer refinements.rbraughn wrote:I have a Kahr PM9. Not the smallest out there, and kinda pricey, but I love mine.
The main advantage of the polygonal rifling is allegedly slightly higher muzzle velocities, but I don't know that it makes much difference in a 3" barrel.mewalke wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:Ditto, but plenty small, and if price is an issue, you can get the CM9 for about half the price of a PM9, which is basically the same gun but with fewer refinements.rbraughn wrote:I have a Kahr PM9. Not the smallest out there, and kinda pricey, but I love mine.I love my CM9 and shooting right next to a PM9 I don't see any loss in accuracy due to the standard rifling.
Good to know, I thought it had to do with accuracy. Is it also correct that you can't use lead (unjacketed) bullets in a polygonal rifled barrel?The Annoyed Man wrote:The main advantage of the polygonal rifling is allegedly slightly higher muzzle velocities, but I don't know that it makes much difference in a 3" barrel.mewalke wrote:The Annoyed Man wrote:Ditto, but plenty small, and if price is an issue, you can get the CM9 for about half the price of a PM9, which is basically the same gun but with fewer refinements.rbraughn wrote:I have a Kahr PM9. Not the smallest out there, and kinda pricey, but I love mine.I love my CM9 and shooting right next to a PM9 I don't see any loss in accuracy due to the standard rifling.
Lano,Lano wrote:I know the OP stated no strikers. (Can't imagine why tho) I am a recent Kahr CM9 owner. Fantastic pocket gun in 9mm. You owe it to yourself to at least look at one. Note: The CM9 can be had very reasonable compared to other Kahrs. It is a great little gun with no external safety and no magazine disconnect.
Indeed you do. I grew up in the far northeast corner, closer to Canada than to Memphis.xring wrote:Hi Vol Texan,
Do I perceive a Tennessee connection there?
xring