New Larue Stance

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

MadMonkey
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1352
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:23 am
Location: North Texas

Re: New Larue Stance

#16

Post by MadMonkey »

I've never ordered from LaRue, but I want to now :cheers2:
“Beware the fury of a patient man.” - John Dryden
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: New Larue Stance

#17

Post by baldeagle »

gigag04 wrote:While I approve of the e-mail, when I saw it in the inbox, I was really hoping it was going to be a shipping notification of one of the many backorders I have open with them.

And AEA - I think it is a state by state thing right now. Meaning NYPD can only get fixed stocks, 10rd mags etc.
Lordy be, if you can afford to buy Larues, I want a job on your force. Got any openings for computer geeks???? :biggrinjester:
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member

texanjoker

Re: New Larue Stance

#18

Post by texanjoker »

So they won't sell to the local LEO's, yet they still will sale to the feds :thumbs2: ? That is pretty lame! I didn't see the local's sending guns to Mexico. Many local leo's have to purchase their own equipment that is then used to protect the public at no expense to the tax payer. As an example, even in Draconian places like CA, if one gets a letter from work they can purchase a AR15 patrol rifle for use at work. The public benefits from those purchases. Sure people can whine that they can't buy one, and it's not fair or whatever, but you know what, our street cops need the gear to do the job w/o all the political nonsense. Last time I checked it is also the LOCAL sheriff's that are making the stand against pending Draconian gun legislation. But hey, if they want to drive away the LEO market, have at it. There are other vendors out there. My $800 Bushmaster does the job just fine. :fire

K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: New Larue Stance

#19

Post by K.Mooneyham »

@texanjoker: I believe the statement was worded as such by LaRue Tactical because the Feds haven't passed any new laws that ban current firearms nor does it seem likely that they will. The same cannot be said of New York or California.
User avatar

nightmare
Deactivated until real name is provided
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 496
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:09 pm

Re: New Larue Stance

#20

Post by nightmare »

gigag04 wrote:
brainman wrote:Though I did just see on their facebook page that they are not applying this rule to federal agencies. I really don't like that part.
Fed agencies haven't really limited us (yet)
Does that mean he won't sell feds select fire manufactured after 1986? Otherwise it's just a publicity stunt.
Equo ne credite, Teucri. Quidquid id est, timeo Danaos et dona ferentes

w squared
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:28 am

Re: New Larue Stance

#21

Post by w squared »

Mr. LaRue makes a top-notch product. The only items that I've purchased have been a pair of scope mounts, but they were exceptionally well made and served me well. Then he goes and does this...and ensures that when I'm in the market for something he manufactures, his products will be a the top of my list.

This is similar to what Ronnie Barrett did a few years back - and just as worthy of praise.

texanjoker

Re: New Larue Stance

#22

Post by texanjoker »

K.Mooneyham wrote:@texanjoker: I believe the statement was worded as such by LaRue Tactical because the Feds haven't passed any new laws that ban current firearms nor does it seem likely that they will. The same cannot be said of New York or California.
In CA a LEO can get a letter from work to purchase certain items that will be used at work. The items go through a FFL so there is nothing illegal about it. However, when they leave work (retire,quit) they have to surrender that item to their employer and are not reimbursed :smash: .

The business owner has this right. Just thinking its wrong.
User avatar

Matt78665
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:41 pm
Location: Round Rock Texas

Re: New Larue Stance

#23

Post by Matt78665 »

OldCannon wrote:
gigag04 wrote:While I approve of the e-mail, when I saw it in the inbox, I was really hoping it was going to be a shipping notification of one of the many backorders I have open with them.

And AEA - I think it is a state by state thing right now. Meaning NYPD can only get fixed stocks, 7rd mags etc.
Fixed it for ya :tiphat:

Man I wish I could buy something from them.......I may have to order a sticker of T shirt from LaRue just to show my support. The anti's have made there bed not let them lie in it
"Though defensive violence will always be a 'sad necessity' in the eyes of men of principle, it would be still more unfortunate if wrongdoers should dominate just men."
St. Augustine

remington79
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: a little bit of everywhere

Re: New Larue Stance

#24

Post by remington79 »

Here's another company taking a stand. http://www.yorkarms.com/ny.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

in addition Magpul will leave CO if any form of a new law is passed. http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ ... state-over" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sent to you from Galt's Gulch.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”