chasfm11 wrote:n5wd wrote:Jumping Frog wrote:I see you are new to this forum, so
WELCOME!
jlw02tx wrote:It's not confiscation I'm worried about, it's my insurance company using it against me that I'm worried about. Not to mention the fact that anyone who has access to their computers has my home address and knows that there are guns in the house. I go back and forth between being irritated and thinking I'm making a big deal out of nothing.
Don't forget that part of Obama-"care" is establishing a national medical information database. If is far more than just your insurance company.
Jumping Frog, you're just plain wrong on this one! The Medical Information Bureau, now known as the MIB Group
http://www.mib.com/ has
since 1902, been exchanging information amongst insurance companies, both life and health, regarding the vast amount of Americans who have used healthcare paid for by insurance, or have put in a life insurance claim.
And, they share their information with "other consumer reporting agencies", namely the credit reporting agencies. You feel better about everyone knowing your business, now?
Obamacare finalized plans that required health care information to be computerized, but the info has been reported to the Medical Information Bureau for many decades before that.
The the OP: jlw02tx - as others have said, if you're uncomfortable with the doc, find a new pediatrician. Your doc also has a requirement to tell you what he does with that information - ask him. And don't let him just show you the HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) form that you had to sign - ask him specifically what he does with the answer to that question. If you don't like the answers, tell him you're going to find a new doc, and then do that. You might find that he's more willing to delete that info than you found, before.
I've carefully reviewed every piece of information that is on our credit bureau reports and can find nothing that looks like any of this data. Does that mean that the three credit agencies are deliberately withholding data that they collect about me?
Maybe I've missed it but who is responsible for the doctors being required to ask the question? The insurance company that covers the doctor? The medical insurance companies that cover the patients? Some governmental mandate? I cannot believe that doctors do this without prompting from someone.
We've taken our granddaughter in for treatment several times and have never been asked a question like this. So either both of the pediatricians that we visited with her were not complying or we just look like the "firearms types."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/462e9/462e9870b36ef095753d348a19c9210e883bb164" alt="evil :evil2:"
If they had asked, I'd probably have said "yes and I cling to my religion, too."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9daaf/9daafdabc81ec5689e7966a090052e9adc29e496" alt="Jester :biggrinjester:"
The American Academy of Pediatrics is behind it and is a radical left wing socialist organization pushing gun confiscation, and as with all collectivists, they lie .....
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/c ... 4/888.full
This statement reaffirms the 1992 position of the American Academy of Pediatrics that the absence of guns from children's homes and communities is the most reliable and effective measure to prevent firearm-related injuries in children and adolescents. A number of specific measures are supported to reduce the destructive effects of guns in the lives of children and adolescents, including the regulation of the manufacture, sale, purchase, ownership, and use of firearms; a ban on handguns and semiautomatic assault weapons; and expanded regulations of handguns for civilian use. In addition, this statement reviews recent data, trends, prevention, and intervention strategies of the past 5 years.
The widely publicized estimates of the number of defensive gun uses in the millions each year are not credible.51
Several legal reviews emphasize that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual's gun ownership. Two cases,Presser v Illinois and United States v Miller, have established the meaning of the Second Amendment.59,,60These and later federal court rulings have indicated that the “right” to bear arms is linked to the preservation of state militias and is not intended to provide for an individual's right to own a firearm. The federal government could ban whole categories of firearms, such as handguns and assault weapons
Pediatricians and other child health care professionals are urged to inform parents about the dangers of guns in and outside the home. The AAP recommends that pediatricians incorporate questions about guns into their patient history taking and urge parents who possess guns to remove them, especially handguns, from the home.
2. The AAP urges that guns be subject to safety and design regulations, like other consumer products, as well as tracing.
(Trigger locks, lock boxes, and other safe storage legislation are encouraged by the AAP, until guns are fully removed from the environment of children.
---in other words, they're seeking a gun ban.
5. The AAP urges that a coordinated, comprehensive, national surveillance data system be maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as well as the National Center for Health Statistics.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com